Literature DB >> 28670054

Rate of contralateral hip fracture after dynamic hip screw vs intramedullary nail for treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures.

Jonathan D Hughes1, Justin H Bartley1, Kindyle L Brennan1, Yolanda Munoz Maldonado1, Michael L Brennan1, Christopher D Chaput1.   

Abstract

A retrospective, comparative study was performed reviewing the electronic medical records and digital radiographs of patients who underwent treatment for intertrochanteric and pertrochanteric hip fractures with either a hip screw and side plate (HSSP) or intramedullary nail. A total of 430 patients were treated with HSSP, and 725 were managed with a cephalomedullary nail (CMN). Of these, 103 sustained a contralateral hip fracture. Fixation technique was not associated with a significant difference in the rate of contralateral fracture. Among the patients with a contralateral fracture, the median time to contralateral fracture was 119.28 months following HSSP and 81.97 months following CMN. Bisphosphonate use was found to be a significant predictor of contralateral fracture for all patients, but when matching using propensity scores, its use was found to be insignificant. In conclusion, there was no difference in the rate of subsequent contralateral hip fracture when comparing HSSP with CMN. Additionally, the time to second surgery between the two treatment modalities was found to be statistically insignificant. It is unclear if bisphosphonate use increased the odds of having a contralateral fracture, regardless of the surgical intervention. The difference in the bisphosphonate effect using propensity score matching suggests that the results may be due to confounding variables and bias.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28670054      PMCID: PMC5468010          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11929612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  25 in total

1.  The risk of a second hip fracture in patients after their first hip fracture.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Takeshi Sawaguchi; Naoto Endo; Yasuyo Ito; Tetsuo Nakano; Yoshinobu Watanabe
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Hip fracture: a complex illness among complex patients.

Authors:  William W Hung; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The rate of contralateral proximal femoral fracture following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning compared with arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Christopher D Souder; Michael L Brennan; Kindyle Losey Brennan; Juhee Song; Johnathan Williams; Christopher Chaput
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  T Nymark; J M Lauritsen; O Ovesen; N D Röck; B Jeune
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  C I Adams; C M Robinson; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation.

Authors:  Dinesh K Dhanwal; Elaine M Dennison; Nick C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Bilateral fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  D A Boston
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  [Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN)].

Authors:  S Nuber; T Schönweiss; A Rüter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: a population-based study.

Authors:  G L Lu-Yao; J A Baron; J A Barrett; E S Fisher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  2 in total

1.  Finite Element Analysis of Cannulated Screws as Prophylactic Intervention of Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Brian Rhee; Steven M Tommasini; Kenneth Milligan; Julia Moulton; Michael Leslie; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-24

2.  Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients.

Authors:  Kirsten Marie Larsen Grønhaug; Eva Dybvik; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Kristian Samuelsson; Bengt Östman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.