Literature DB >> 22398735

The rate of contralateral proximal femoral fracture following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning compared with arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Christopher D Souder1, Michael L Brennan, Kindyle Losey Brennan, Juhee Song, Johnathan Williams, Christopher Chaput.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures.
METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied.
RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22398735     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  Comment on Lee et al.: incidence of second hip fracture and compliant use of bisphosphonate.

Authors:  Y Zhu; W Chen; Y Zhang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Impact of Cigarette Smoking on Re-operation and Revision Surgery after Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment.

Authors:  Mitchell K Messner; Alexander C M Chong; Bruce E Piatt
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-08-17

3.  Anteromedial femoral neck plate with cannulated screws for the treatment of irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture in young patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Linbo Zhuang; Lisheng Wang; Dongming Xu; Zhiyong Wang
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Incidence of second hip fracture and compliant use of bisphosphonate.

Authors:  Y-K Lee; Y-C Ha; B-H Yoon; K-H Koo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Rate of contralateral hip fracture after dynamic hip screw vs intramedullary nail for treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Jonathan D Hughes; Justin H Bartley; Kindyle L Brennan; Yolanda Munoz Maldonado; Michael L Brennan; Christopher D Chaput
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-07

6.  Treatment and displacement affect the reoperation rate for femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Donavan K Murphy; Timmothy Randell; Kindyle L Brennan; Robert A Probe; Michael L Brennan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The burden of second hip fractures: provincial surgical hospitalizations over 15 years.

Authors:  Pierre Guy; Boris Sobolev; Katie Jane Sheehan; Lisa Kuramoto; Kelly Ann Lefaivre
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Incidence of second hip fractures and associated mortality in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based study of 95,484 patients during 2006-2010.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsun Lee; I-Jung Chen; Ya-Hsin Li; Chih-Yun Fan Chiang; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients.

Authors:  Kirsten Marie Larsen Grønhaug; Eva Dybvik; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Kristian Samuelsson; Bengt Östman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.562

10.  Risk factors for contralateral hip refractures in patients aged over 80 years with intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Shujun Yu; Chen Li; Yuqiao Zhong; Jiacheng Zang; Zhanzhe Zhou; Song Wang; Yinguang Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.