| Literature DB >> 28670028 |
Fabrício Bolpato Loures1, Renato Janetti Carrara2, Rogério Franco de Araújo Góes3, Rodrigo Sattamini Pires E Albuquerque4, João Maurício Barretto5, André Kinder6, Vinicius Schott Gameiro7, Edson Marchiori8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative measurements of the knee with those obtained by magnetic resonance imaging, in order to validate the latter method for use in anthropometric studies.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometry; Diagnostic imaging; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis; Prostheses
Year: 2017 PMID: 28670028 PMCID: PMC5487231 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Bras ISSN: 0100-3984
Figure 1Schematic of the measurements. A: Distal right femur: 1, lateral condyle height; 2, medial condyle height; 3, total femur width; 4, lateral condyle width, 5, medial condyle width; 6, intercondylar width. B: Right proximal tibia: 1, anteroposterior width; 2, mediolateral width. Source: Loures et al.(.
Figure 2Intraoperative measurement. A: Right distal femur: measurement of the total width. B: Right proximal tibia: measurement of the mediolateral width.
Figure 3MRI measurement. A: Right distal femur: measurement of the total width. B: Left proximal tibia: measurement of the anteroposterior width.
Measurements obtained intraoperatively (caliper method) and by MRI.
| Parameter | Method | Mean | SD | Median | Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total width of the femur | Caliper | 67.9 | 4.3 | 68 | 62 | 77 |
| MRI | 69.7 | 5.3 | 68 | 63 | 81 | |
| Lateral condyle width | Caliper | 27.3 | 3.7 | 27 | 22 | 37 |
| MRI | 26.9 | 3.0 | 26.5 | 23 | 34 | |
| Medial condyle width | Caliper | 26.5 | 2.7 | 26.5 | 22 | 32 |
| MRI | 26.6 | 2.4 | 26 | 23 | 33 | |
| Intercondylar width | Caliper | 17.5 | 2.6 | 18 | 12 | 22 |
| MRI | 16.9 | 2.7 | 16 | 12 | 23 | |
| Lateral condyle height | Caliper | 63.4 | 4.8 | 63.5 | 54 | 74 |
| MRI | 63.6 | 4.2 | 63.5 | 54 | 73 | |
| Medial condyle height | Caliper | 62.9 | 4.6 | 62.5 | 54 | 73 |
| MRI | 61.6 | 4.9 | 61 | 53 | 73 | |
| Mediolateral width of the tibia | Caliper | 70.5 | 7.5 | 71 | 51 | 86 |
| MRI | 71.3 | 8.2 | 70.5 | 52 | 89 | |
| Anteroposterior width of the tibia | Caliper | 48.1 | 7.2 | 46 | 42 | 75 |
| MRI | 48.5 | 6.9 | 47 | 42 | 74 |
SD, standard deviation; Min., minimum; Max., maximum.
Figure 4Comparison of measurements performed intraoperatively and by MRI.
Comparison between the two measurement methods.
| Measurement | ICC | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total width of the femur | 0.864 | 0.693-0.943 | < 0.0001 |
| Lateral condyle width | 0.866 | 0.697-0.944 | < 0.0001 |
| Medial condyle width | 0.677[ | 0.353-0.857[ | 0.0002 |
| Intercondylar width | 0.706[ | 0.400-0.871[ | 0.0001 |
| Lateral condyle height | 0.912 | 0.794-0.964 | < 0.0001 |
| Medial condyle height | 0.840 | 0.645-0.933 | < 0.0001 |
| Mediolateral width of the tibia | 0.958[ | 0.898-0.983[ | < 0.0001 |
| Anteroposterior width of the tibia | 0.977[ | 0.943-0.991[ | < 0.0001 |
ICC, intraclass coefficient correlation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Excellent correlation;
Good correlation;
Near perfect correlation.