Literature DB >> 28668062

Structure-based sampling and self-correcting machine learning for accurate calculations of potential energy surfaces and vibrational levels.

Pavlo O Dral1, Alec Owens1, Sergei N Yurchenko2, Walter Thiel1.   

Abstract

We present an efficient approach for generating highly accurate molecular potential energy surfaces (PESs) using self-correcting, kernel ridge regression (KRR) based machine learning (ML). We introduce structure-based sampling to automatically assign nuclear configurations from a pre-defined grid to the training and prediction sets, respectively. Accurate high-level ab initio energies are required only for the points in the training set, while the energies for the remaining points are provided by the ML model with negligible computational cost. The proposed sampling procedure is shown to be superior to random sampling and also eliminates the need for training several ML models. Self-correcting machine learning has been implemented such that each additional layer corrects errors from the previous layer. The performance of our approach is demonstrated in a case study on a published high-level ab initio PES of methyl chloride with 44 819 points. The ML model is trained on sets of different sizes and then used to predict the energies for tens of thousands of nuclear configurations within seconds. The resulting datasets are utilized in variational calculations of the vibrational energy levels of CH3Cl. By using both structure-based sampling and self-correction, the size of the training set can be kept small (e.g., 10% of the points) without any significant loss of accuracy. In ab initio rovibrational spectroscopy, it is thus possible to reduce the number of computationally costly electronic structure calculations through structure-based sampling and self-correcting KRR-based machine learning by up to 90%.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668062     DOI: 10.1063/1.4989536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  13 in total

Review 1.  Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Kevin Maik Jablonka; Daniele Ongari; Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Berend Smit
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Adaptive Neural Networks.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Machine Learning for Electronically Excited States of Molecules.

Authors:  Julia Westermayr; Philipp Marquetand
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Gaussian Process Regression for Materials and Molecules.

Authors:  Volker L Deringer; Albert P Bartók; Noam Bernstein; David M Wilkins; Michele Ceriotti; Gábor Csányi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Ab Initio Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space.

Authors:  Bing Huang; O Anatole von Lilienfeld
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 6.  MLatom 2: An Integrative Platform for Atomistic Machine Learning.

Authors:  Pavlo O Dral; Fuchun Ge; Bao-Xin Xue; Yi-Fan Hou; Max Pinheiro; Jianxing Huang; Mario Barbatti
Journal:  Top Curr Chem (Cham)       Date:  2021-06-08

7.  Theoretical studies on triplet-state driven dissociation of formaldehyde by quasi-classical molecular dynamics simulation on machine-learning potential energy surface.

Authors:  Shichen Lin; Daoling Peng; Weitao Yang; Feng Long Gu; Zhenggang Lan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems.

Authors:  John A Keith; Valentin Vassilev-Galindo; Bingqing Cheng; Stefan Chmiela; Michael Gastegger; Klaus-Robert Müller; Alexandre Tkatchenko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields.

Authors:  Stefan Chmiela; Huziel E Sauceda; Klaus-Robert Müller; Alexandre Tkatchenko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Pavlo O Dral; Mario Barbatti; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.