Literature DB >> 28667798

A genomic investigation of ecological differentiation between free-living and Drosophila-associated bacteria.

Nathan J Winans1, Alec Walter2, Bessem Chouaia1, John M Chaston1,3, Angela E Douglas1,4, Peter D Newell1,2.   

Abstract

Various bacterial taxa have been identified both in association with animals and in the external environment, but the extent to which related bacteria from the two habitat types are ecologically and evolutionarily distinct is largely unknown. This study investigated the scale and pattern of genetic differentiation between bacteria of the family Acetobacteraceae isolated from the guts of Drosophila fruit flies, plant material and industrial fermentations. Genome-scale analysis of the phylogenetic relationships and predicted functions was conducted on 44 Acetobacteraceae isolates, including newly sequenced genomes from 18 isolates from wild and laboratory Drosophila. Isolates from the external environment and Drosophila could not be assigned to distinct phylogenetic groups, nor are their genomes enriched for any different sets of genes or category of predicted gene functions. In contrast, analysis of bacteria from laboratory Drosophila showed they were genetically distinct in their universal capacity to degrade uric acid (a major nitrogenous waste product of Drosophila) and absence of flagellar motility, while these traits vary among wild Drosophila isolates. Analysis of the competitive fitness of Acetobacter discordant for these traits revealed a significant fitness deficit for bacteria that cannot degrade uric acid in culture with Drosophila. We propose that, for wild populations, frequent cycling of Acetobacter between Drosophila and the external environment prevents genetic differentiation by maintaining selection for traits adaptive in both the gut and external habitats. However, laboratory isolates bear the signs of adaptation to persistent association with the Drosophila host under tightly defined environmental conditions.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Acetobacterzzm321990; zzm321990Drosophilazzm321990; gut microbiota; symbiosis; uric acid

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28667798      PMCID: PMC5570652          DOI: 10.1111/mec.14232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  63 in total

1.  Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Raegan McKay; Zenobia Lewis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 2.  Lessons from studying insect symbioses.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 3.  Transient adult microbiota, gut homeostasis and longevity: novel insights from the Drosophila model.

Authors:  Berra Erkosar; François Leulier
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  Evolutionary Ecology of Prokaryotic Immune Mechanisms.

Authors:  Stineke van Houte; Angus Buckling; Edze R Westra
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  A simple method for genome-wide screening for advantageous insertions of mobile DNAs in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Richard J Edwards; R Elizabeth Sockett; John F Y Brookfield
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Evolutionary perspectives in a mutualism of sepiolid squid and bioluminescent bacteria: combined usage of microbial experimental evolution and temporal population genetics.

Authors:  W Soto; E B Punke; M K Nishiguchi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The inconstant gut microbiota of Drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Selection-driven gene loss in bacteria.

Authors:  Sanna Koskiniemi; Song Sun; Otto G Berg; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Invasive Drosophila suzukii facilitates Drosophila melanogaster infestation and sour rot outbreaks in the vineyards.

Authors:  A Rombaut; R Guilhot; A Xuéreb; L Benoit; M P Chapuis; P Gibert; S Fellous
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment.

Authors:  Fabian Staubach; John F Baines; Sven Künzel; Elisabeth M Bik; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster establishes a species-specific mutualistic interaction with stable gut-colonizing bacteria.

Authors:  Inês S Pais; Rita S Valente; Marta Sporniak; Luis Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  Microbial community assembly in wild populations of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Karen L Adair; Marita Wilson; Alyssa Bost; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Functional traits of the gut microbiome correlated with host lipid content in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David Kang; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Drosophila-associated bacteria differentially shape the nutritional requirements of their host during juvenile growth.

Authors:  Jessika Consuegra; Théodore Grenier; Patrice Baa-Puyoulet; Isabelle Rahioui; Houssam Akherraz; Hugo Gervais; Nicolas Parisot; Pedro da Silva; Hubert Charles; Federica Calevro; François Leulier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John G McMullen; Grace Peters-Schulze; Jingwei Cai; Andrew D Patterson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Metabolic Basis for Mutualism between Gut Bacteria and Its Impact on the Drosophila melanogaster Host.

Authors:  Andrew J Sommer; Peter D Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy.

Authors:  Amber W Walters; Rachel C Hughes; Tanner B Call; Carson J Walker; Hailey Wilcox; Samara C Petersen; Seth M Rudman; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas; Paul S Schmidt; John M Chaston
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Host determinants of among-species variation in microbiome composition in drosophilid flies.

Authors:  Karen L Adair; Alyssa Bost; Eduardo Bueno; Sirpa Kaunisto; Raine Kortet; Grace Peters-Schulze; Vincent G Martinson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Immune Gene Expression Covaries with Gut Microbiome Composition in Stickleback.

Authors:  Lauren E Fuess; Stijn den Haan; Fei Ling; Jesse N Weber; Natalie C Steinel; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 10.  Anatomy and Physiology of the Digestive Tract of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Irene Miguel-Aliaga; Heinrich Jasper; Bruno Lemaitre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.