| Literature DB >> 28665302 |
Fernanda Zaccari1,2, María Cristina Cabrera3,4, Ali Saadoun5.
Abstract
Glucose content and in vitro bioaccessibility were determined in raw and cooked pulp of Arapey, Cuabé, and Beauregard sweet potato varieties, as well as Maravilla del Mercado and Atlas winter squash, after zero, two, four, and six months of storage (14 °C, 80% relative humidity (RH)). The total glucose content in 100 g of raw pulp was, for Arapey, 17.7 g; Beauregard, 13.2 g; Cuabé, 12.6 g; Atlas, 4.0 g; and in Maravilla del Mercado, 4.1 g. These contents were reduced by cooking process and storage time, 1.1 to 1.5 times, respectively, depending on the sweet potato variety. In winter squash varieties, the total glucose content was not modified by cooking, while the storage increased glucose content 2.8 times in the second month. After in vitro digestion, the glucose content released was 7.0 times higher in sweet potato (6.4 g) than in winter squash (0.91 g) varieties. Glucose released by in vitro digestion for sweet potato stored for six months did not change, but in winter squashes, stored Atlas released glucose content increased 1.6 times. In conclusion, in sweet potato and winter squash, the glucose content and the released glucose during digestive simulation depends on the variety and the storage time. These factors strongly affect the supply of glucose for human nutrition and should be taken into account for adjusting a diet according to consumer needs.Entities:
Keywords: Cucurbita sp.; Ipomoea batatas; bioaccessibility; glucose; postharvest
Year: 2017 PMID: 28665302 PMCID: PMC5532555 DOI: 10.3390/foods6070048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Total glucose content (g 100 g−1 fw) in raw and cooked pulp from sweet potato and winter squash varieties stored for different times. Means ± SEM (n = 6). Different lowercase letters on each column, for sweet potatoes or winter squash, indicate statistical differences (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05) between varieties for each process (raw or cooked) and storage time. Uppercase letters indicate statistical differences between storage times for each variety and process (raw or cooked). * denotes statistical differences by Student’s t test (p ≤ 0.05) between process (raw and cooked) in each variety and storage time.
Total glucose (g) released by in vitro digestion in 100 g cooked pulp from sweet potato and winter squash varieties stored at different times.
| Storage Time (Months) | Sweet Potato | Winter Squash | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arapey | Beauregard | Cuabé | Maravilla del Mercado | Atlas | |
| 0 | 8.4 ± 1.0 | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 1.1 ± 0.03 a,B | 0.5 ± 0.07 b,A |
| 2 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.06 a,A | 0.4 ± 0.05 b,A |
| 4 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 7.5 ± 1.4 | 7.3 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.01 a,A,B | 0.7 ± 0.07 b,A |
| 6 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.09 a,B | 0.8 ± 0.12 a,A |
| Main Effects ( | |||||
| Sweet Potato 0.1205 0.1958 0.0676 | |||||
| Winter Squash 0.0001 0.0542 0.0032 | |||||
Means ± standard error (n = 6). For sweet potato or winter squash, lowercase letters on each row indicate differences (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05) between varieties in the same storage time, and uppercase letters indicate differences between storage times for each variety. No letters indicate a lack of a statistical difference.
Figure 2Percentage of in vitro bioaccessible glucose in cooked pulp from sweet potato and winter squash varieties stored for different times. Bars are means ± SEM (n = 6). For sweet potato or winter squash, lowercase letters on each column represent differences (Tukey p ≤ 0.05) between varieties at each storage time, and uppercase letters represent differences between storage times for each variety.