Literature DB >> 28664481

Comparison of conventional and cadmium-zinc-telluride single-photon emission computed tomography for analysis of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging: an exploratory study in normal databases for different ethnicities.

Masaru Ishihara1,2, Masahisa Onoguchi3, Yasuyo Taniguchi4, Takayuki Shibutani2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify the differences in thallium-201-chloride (thallium-201) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) scans evaluated by conventional anger-type single-photon emission computed tomography (conventional SPECT) versus cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT (CZT SPECT) imaging in normal databases for different ethnic groups. MPI scans from 81 consecutive Japanese patients were examined using conventional SPECT and CZT SPECT and analyzed with the pre-installed quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) software. We compared the summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS) for the two SPECT devices. For a normal MPI reference, we usually use Japanese databases for MPI created by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine, which can be used with conventional SPECT but not with CZT SPECT. In this study, we used new Japanese normal databases constructed in our institution to compare conventional and CZT SPECT. Compared with conventional SPECT, CZT SPECT showed lower SSS (p < 0.001), SRS (p = 0.001), and SDS (p = 0.189) using the pre-installed SPECT database. In contrast, CZT SPECT showed no significant difference from conventional SPECT in QPS analysis using the normal databases from our institution. Myocardial perfusion analyses by CZT SPECT should be evaluated using normal databases based on the ethnic group being evaluated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional anger-type gamma camera; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Single-photon emission computed tomography; Solid-state dedicated cardiac gamma camera; Thallium-201

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664481     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1205-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  22 in total

Review 1.  Radiopharmaceutical agents for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Aaron L Baggish; Charles A Boucher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Comparison of technetium-99m tetrofosmin and thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging for detection of myocardial perfusion defects in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  H Shanoudy; P Raggi; G A Beller; A Soliman; E G Ammermann; R J Kastner; D D Watson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Optimal thallium-201 dose in cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Masaru Ishihara; Yasuyo Taniguchi; Masahisa Onoguchi; Takayuki Shibutani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prediction of left main or 3-vessel disease using myocardial perfusion reserve on dynamic thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography with a semiconductor gamma camera.

Authors:  Shinya Shiraishi; Fumi Sakamoto; Noriko Tsuda; Morikatsu Yoshida; Seiji Tomiguchi; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Hisao Ogawa; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.993

6.  Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging using thallium-201 between a new cadmium-zinc-telluride cardiac camera and a conventional SPECT camera.

Authors:  Bernard Songy; David Lussato; Mohamed Guernou; Mathieu Queneau; Ricardo Geronazzo
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  Quantitative high-efficiency cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT with dedicated parallel-hole collimation system in obese patients: results of a multi-center study.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Piotr J Slomka; Mathews Fish; Ronald G Schwartz; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Mark Lemley; Maria L Mackin; Benjamin Peterson; Arielle M Schwartz; Jesse A Doran; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  High-speed myocardial perfusion imaging initial clinical comparison with conventional dual detector anger camera imaging.

Authors:  Tali Sharir; Simona Ben-Haim; Konstantine Merzon; Vitali Prochorov; Dalia Dickman; Shlomo Ben-Haim; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03

9.  Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact.

Authors:  E G DePuey; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Diagnostic performance of a novel cadmium-zinc-telluride gamma camera system assessed using fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Taishiro Chikamori; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Satoshi Hida; Yuko Igarashi; Jun Yamashita; Masashi Ogawa; Chie Shiba; Yasuhiro Usui; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.993

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Imaging technology for myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography 2018 in Japan.

Authors:  Takayuki Shibutani; Koichi Okuda; Hajime Ichikawa; Toyohiro Kato; Kenta Miwa; Hiroyuki Tsushima; Masahisa Onoguchi; Akio Nagaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  An Exploratory Study of Washout Rate Analysis for Thallium-201 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Cadmium Zinc Telluride Detectors.

Authors:  Masaru Ishihara; Masahisa Onoguchi; Takayuki Shibutani
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.