Literature DB >> 28664430

Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons.

Nobuki Ichikawa1,2, Shigenori Homma3, Tadashi Yoshida3, Yosuke Ohno3, Hideki Kawamura3, You Kamiizumi4, Hiroaki Iijima5, Akinobu Taketomi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic colectomy is becoming widespread and acquisition of its technique is challenging. In this study, we investigated whether supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons.
METHODS: The outcomes of 23 right colectomies and 19 high anterior resections for colon cancers performed by five novice surgeons (experience level of <10 cases) between 2014 and 2016 were assessed. A laparoscopic surgeon qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery) participated in surgeries as the teaching assistant.
RESULTS: In the right colectomy group, one patient (4.3%) required conversion to open surgery and postoperative morbidities occurred in two cases (8.6%). The operative time moving average gradually decreased from 216 to 150 min, and the blood loss decreased from 128 to 28 mL. In the CUSUM charts, the values for operative time decreased continuously after the 18th case, as compared to the Japanese standard. The values for blood loss also plateaued after the 18th case. In the high anterior resection group, one patient (5.2%) required conversion to open surgery and no postoperative complication occurred in any patient. The operative time moving average gradually decreased from 258 to 228 min, and the blood loss decreased from 33 to 18 mL. The CUSUM charts showed that the values of operative time plateaued after the 18th case, as compared to the Japanese standard. In the CUSUM chart for blood loss, no distinguishing peak or trend was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons. The trainee's learning curve in this study represents successful mentoring by the laparoscopic surgeon qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beginner; Colorectal; Laparoscopic; Proficiency; Safety; Technical qualification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664430     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5701-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

Review 1.  Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroshi Katayama; Junki Mizusawa; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Fumio Konishi; Kenichi Sugihara; Masahiko Watanabe; Yoshihiro Moriya; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Postoperative analgesia using fentanyl plus celecoxib versus epidural anesthesia after laparoscopic colon resection.

Authors:  Tadashi Yoshida; Shigenori Homma; Susumu Shibasaki; Tatsushi Shimokuni; Hideyasu Sakihama; Norihiko Takahashi; Hideki Kawamura; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Trends in lymph node excision and impact of positive lymph node ratio in patients with colectomy for primary colon adenocarcinoma: Population based study 1988 to 2011.

Authors:  Brandon Garcia; Carlos Guzman; Christopher Johnson; Nicholas J Hellenthal; Daphne Monie; Jose Raul Monzon
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  National proficiency-gain curves for minimally invasive gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H Mackenzie; S R Markar; A Askari; M Ni; O Faiz; G B Hanna
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Feasibility of needlescopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safety and learning curve for Japanese Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-unqualified young surgeons.

Authors:  Hisanori Miki; Yosuke Fukunaga; Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Distance of Peritoneum to Inferior Mesenteric Artery Predicts the Operation Time During Laparoscopic Colectomy for Sigmoid or Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Takafumi Saeki; Yasunori Otowa; Yuta Yamazaki; Keisuke Arai; Takashi Shimizu; Yasuhiko Mii; Keitaro Kakinoki; Shigeteru Oka; Tetsu Nakamura; Daisuke Kuroda
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Transitional impact of short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Tomonori Akagi; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroshi Katayama; Junki Mizusawa; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Shuji Saito; Yusuke Kinugasa; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Takeo Sato; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-03-26

4.  Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Keisuke Kazama; Masakatsu Numata; Toru Aoyama; Yosuke Atsumi; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Teni Godai; Hiroyuki Saeki; Yusuke Saigusa; Manabu Shiozawa; Norio Yukawa; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Clinical impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and low anterior resection based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) registry.

Authors:  Tomonori Akagi; Hideki Endo; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Toshiyuki Mori; Kazuyuki Kojima; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Yoshiharu Sakai; Kentaro Nakajima; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Yoshihisa Saida; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Hideki Ueno; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Hiroaki Miyata; Yuko Kitagawa; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-08-31

6.  An online feedback system for laparoscopic training during the COVID-19 pandemic: evaluation from the trainer perspective.

Authors:  Daigo Kuboki; Hiroshi Kawahira; Yoshitaka Maeda; Kosuke Oiwa; Teruhiko Unoki; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Naohiro Sata
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-19

7.  Impact of technically qualified surgeons on laparoscopic colorectal resection outcomes: results of a propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  N Ichikawa; S Homma; T Funakoshi; T Ohshima; K Hirose; K Yamada; H Nakamoto; K Kazui; R Yokota; T Honma; Y Maeda; T Yoshida; T Ishikawa; H Iijima; T Aiyama; A Taketomi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-03-24

8.  Supervision as a tool for building surgical capacity of district hospitals: the case of Zambia.

Authors:  Jakub Gajewski; Nasser Monzer; Chiara Pittalis; Leon Bijlmakers; Mweene Cheelo; John Kachimba; Ruairi Brugha
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-03-26

9.  Feasibility and Utility of an Eye-Tracking Device for Assessing Teachers of Invasive Bedside Procedures.

Authors:  Diana J Kelm; Melissa M Morrow; Cassie C Kennedy; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-06-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.