Literature DB >> 24509190

Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.

Seiichiro Yamamoto1, Masafumi Inomata, Hiroshi Katayama, Junki Mizusawa, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Fumio Konishi, Kenichi Sugihara, Masahiko Watanabe, Yoshihiro Moriya, Seigo Kitano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A randomized controlled trial to confirm the non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery in terms of overall survival was conducted, and short-term surgical outcomes are demonstrated.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety outcome of laparoscopic surgery for clinical stages II/III colon cancer undergoing Japanese D3 dissection are still unclear.
METHODS: Eligibility criteria included colon cancer; tumor located in the cecum, ascending, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid colon; T3 or T4 without involvement of other organs; N0-2; and M0. Patients were randomized preoperatively and underwent tumor resection with D3 dissection. Safety analyses were conducted by per-protocol set.
RESULTS: A total of 1057 patients were randomized between October 2004 and March 2009. By per-protocol set, 524 patients who underwent open surgery and 533 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were analyzed. D3 dissection was performed in 521 (99.4%) patients in the open surgery arm and 529 (99.2%) patients in the laparoscopic surgery arm. Conversion to open surgery was needed for 29 (5.4%) patients. Patients assigned to laparoscopic surgery had less blood loss (P < 0.001), although laparoscopic surgery lasted 52 minutes longer (P < 0.001). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a shorter time to pass first flatus, decreased use of analgesics after 5 postoperative days, and a shorter hospital stay. Morbidity [14.3% (76/533) vs 22.3% (117/524), P < 0.001] was lower in the laparoscopic surgery arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term surgical safety and clinical benefits of laparoscopic D3 dissection were demonstrated. The primary endpoint will be reported after the primary analysis, planned for 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509190     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  107 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyuki Tomioka; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  The feasibility of laparoscopic extended pelvic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hayato Nakamura; Keisuke Uehara; Atsuki Arimoto; Takehiro Kato; Tomoki Ebata; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Hadrien Tranchart; David Fuks; Luca Vigano; Stefano Ferretti; François Paye; Go Wakabayashi; Alessandro Ferrero; Brice Gayet; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Epidermal Sutureless Closure of the Umbilical Base Following Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Susumu Shibasaki; Shigenori Homma; Tadashi Yoshida; Hideki Kawamura; Norihiko Takahashi; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Comparing the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy in transverse colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Baloyiannis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Panagiotis Ntellas; Katerina Dadouli; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Initial experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision in Singapore: a case series.

Authors:  Ming Li Ho; Cheryl Chong; Shen Ann Yeo; Chee Yung Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Masashi Yamamoto; Mitsuhiro Asakuma; Keitaro Tanaka; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Masatsugu Ishii; Wataru Osumi; Hiroki Hamamoto; Junji Okuda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Evaluation of lymph flow patterns in splenic flexural colon cancers using laparoscopic real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yusuke Suwa; Atsushi Ishibe; Hidenobu Masui; Kaoru Nagahori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The Short- and Long-Term Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Colon Cancer Patients with Bulky Tumors.

Authors:  Toshiya Nagasaki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Yosuke Fukunaga; Tetsuro Tominaga; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.