Literature DB >> 18028955

Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases and ratio in esophageal cancer.

Matthew Wilson1, Ernest L Rosato, Karen A Chojnacki, Inna Chervoneva, John C Kairys, Herbert E Cohn, Francis E Rosato, Adam C Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of carcinoma of the distal esophagus and GE junction is rapidly increasing. A large single-center experience was reviewed to determine the impact of lymph node positivity and ratio on survival.
METHODS: All patients undergoing esophagogastrectomy at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between January 1994 and December 2004 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using log-rank and Cox proportional hazard models, and survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Of 173 patients with invasive cancer, 123 (71%) underwent preoperative chemoradiation therapy. The largest number of patients (45%) had adenocarcinoma of the GE junction; 29% of patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma while 14% had squamous cell cancer of the esophagus. Perioperative mortality was 5.7%. Median overall survival of the entire group was 22 months and 5-year overall survival was 27%. The most significant prognostic factor for overall survival was the presence of positive LN (P = 0.01). Additionally, patients with zero involved LN had a 5-year survival of 34%, while patients with 1 to 3 positive LN and >3 positive LN had 5-year survival of 27% and 9%, respectively (P = 0.01). Finally, an increasing ratio of positive to examined LN was linearly associated with a worsening 5-year survival, (P = 0.153).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing number of positive LN in patients with esophageal cancer and increasing ratio of metastatic to examined LN portend a poor prognosis. These factors should play an important role in determining which patients receive adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18028955      PMCID: PMC2323456          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  11 in total

1.  Node status in transmural esophageal adenocarcinoma and outcome after en bloc esophagectomy.

Authors:  J J Nigro; S R DeMeester; J A Hagen; T R DeMeester; J H Peters; M Kiyabu; G M Campos; S Oberg; O Gastal; P F Crookes; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yael Refaely; Mark J Krasna
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Cancer statistics, 2005.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Elizabeth Ward; Alicia Samuels; Ram C Tiwari; Asma Ghafoor; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors?

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Stephan E Baldus; Wolfgang Schröder; Paul M Schneider; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival.

Authors:  Adam C Berger; Jeffrey Farma; Walter J Scott; Gary Freedman; Louis Weiner; Jonathan D Cheng; Hao Wang; Melvyn Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes.

Authors:  Adam C Berger; Elin R Sigurdson; Thomas LeVoyer; Alexandra Hanlon; Robert J Mayer; John S Macdonald; Paul J Catalano; Daniel G Haller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status.

Authors:  Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Renee Desmond; Miguel R Arguedas; Carolyn E Reed; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Wayne Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Arlene M Correa; Kenneth Hess; Joe B Putnam; Jaffer A Ajani; Marcelo Dolormente; Rhodette Francisco; Ritsuko R Komaki; Axbal Lara; Faye Martin; David C Rice; Arcenio J Sarabia; W Roy Smythe; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  34 in total

1.  Lymph Node Ratio as an Alternative to the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for the Prediction of Esophageal Carcinoma Patient Survival.

Authors:  Chen Wei; Wen-Ying Deng; Ning Li; Wei Shen; Chi Zhang; Jia-Yu Liu; Su-Xia Luo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  The significance of lymph node status as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Metastatic lymph node ratio and Lauren classification are independent prognostic markers for survival rates of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Xiao-Ming Xing; Lei-Na Ma; Lian Liu; Jing Hao; Ling-Xin Feng; Zhuang Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Comparative Quantitative Lymph Node Assessment in Localized Esophageal Cancer Patients After R0 Resection With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

Authors:  Danica N Giugliano; Adam C Berger; Michael J Pucci; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans; Hanna Meidl; Casey Lamb; Daniel Levine; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  [Gastrointestinal tumors : New N classification of the UICC].

Authors:  C Wittekind; B Oberschmid
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and podoplanin mRNA expression in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka Juchniewicz; Wiesława Niklińska; Oksana Kowalczuk; Wojciech Laudański; Anetta Sulewska; Piotr Dziegielewski; Robert Milewski; Wojciech Naumnik; Mirosław Kozłowski; Jacek Nikliński
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a single center experience.

Authors:  Zachary Torgersen; Abhishek Sundaram; Masato Hoshino; Brittany Willer; Xiang Fang; Tsewang Tashi; Tommy Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-26

9.  Does the mechanism of lymph node invasion affect survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Vikram Deshpande; Hui Zheng; Jennifer A Wargo; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Sarah P Thayer; Vasiliki Androutsopoulos; Gregory Y Lauwers; Andrew L Warshaw; Cristina R Ferrone
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Role of F18-FDG PET/CT in the Staging and Restaging of Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison with CECT.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar; Nishikant A Damle; Chandrasekhar Bal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.