Literature DB >> 25790404

The impact of reproductive health legislation on family planning clinic services in Texas.

Kari White1, Kristine Hopkins, Abigail R A Aiken, Amanda Stevenson, Celia Hubert, Daniel Grossman, Joseph E Potter.   

Abstract

We examined the impact of legislation in Texas that dramatically cut and restricted participation in the state's family planning program in 2011 using surveys and interviews with leaders at organizations that received family planning funding. Overall, 25% of family planning clinics in Texas closed. In 2011, 71% of organizations widely offered long-acting reversible contraception; in 2012-2013, only 46% did so. Organizations served 54% fewer clients than they had in the previous period. Specialized family planning providers, which were the targets of the legislation, experienced the largest reductions in services, but other agencies were also adversely affected. The Texas experience provides valuable insight into the potential effects that legislation proposed in other states may have on low-income women's access to family planning services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25790404      PMCID: PMC4386528          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  9 in total

1.  Threats to family planning services in Michigan: organizational responses to economic and political challenges.

Authors:  Vanessa K Dalton; Peter D Jacobson; Julie Berson-Grand; Carol S Weisman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2005 May-Jun

2.  Survival strategies for Michigan's health care safety net providers.

Authors:  Peter D Jacobson; Vanessa K Dalton; Julie Berson-Grand; Carol S Weisman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Scope of family planning services available in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Susan Wood; Tishra Beeson; Brian Bruen; Debora Goetz Goldberg; Holly Mead; Peter Shin; Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Cutting family planning in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  P D Blumenthal; A Voedisch; K Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).

Authors:  Tishra Beeson; Susan Wood; Brian Bruen; Debora Goetz Goldberg; Holly Mead; Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS).

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  The "Safety Net" of Community Care: Leveraging GIS to Identify Geographic Access Barriers to Texas Family Planning Clinics for Homeless Women Veterans.

Authors:  Lori Gawron; Warren B P Pettey; Andrew Redd; Ying Suo; David K Turok; Adi V Gundlapalli
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Change in Distance to Nearest Facility and Abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Fran Linkin; Celia Hubert; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Prevalence and Predictors of Prenatal and Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling in Two Texas Cities.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Abigail R A Aiken; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Caitlin Canfield; Abigail R A Aiken; Amna Dermish; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Women's experiences after Planned Parenthood's exclusion from a family planning program in Texas.

Authors:  C Junda Woo; Hasanat Alamgir; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  The Availability and Use of Postpartum LARC in Mexico and Among Hispanics in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Celia Hubert; Kari White
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

8.  Availability of Confidential Services for Teens Declined After the 2011-2013 Changes to Publicly Funded Family Planning Programs in Texas.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kristine Hopkins; Kari White
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Payment for Contraceptive Services in Safety Net Clinics: Roles of Affordable Care Act, Title X, and State Programs.

Authors:  Blair G Darney; Frances M Biel; Maria I Rodriguez; R Lorie Jacob; Erika K Cottrell; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Providing Family Planning Services at Primary Care Organizations after the Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from Publicly Funded Programs in Texas: Early Qualitative Evidence.

Authors:  Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.