Literature DB >> 26942356

Barriers to Postpartum Contraception in Texas and Pregnancy Within 2 Years of Delivery.

Joseph E Potter1, Celia Hubert, Amanda Jean Stevenson, Kristine Hopkins, Abigail R A Aiken, Kari White, Daniel Grossman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess pregnancies that could have been averted through improved access to contraceptive methods in the 2 years after delivery.
METHODS: In this cohort study, we interviewed 403 postpartum women in a hospital in Austin, Texas, who wanted to delay childbearing for at least 2 years. Follow-up interviews were completed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after delivery; retention at 24 months was 83%. At each interview, participants reported their pregnancy status and contraceptive method. At the 3- and 6-month interviews, participants were also asked about their preferred contraceptive method 3 months in the future. We identified types of barriers among women unable to access their preferred method and used Cox models to analyze the risk of pregnancy from 6 to 24 months after delivery.
RESULTS: Among women interviewed 6 months postpartum (n=377), two thirds had experienced a barrier to accessing their preferred method of contraception. By 24 months postpartum, 89 women had reported a pregnancy; 71 were unintended. Between 6 and 24 months postpartum, 77 of 377 women became pregnant (20.4%), with 56 (14.9%) lost to follow-up. Women who encountered a barrier to obtaining their preferred method were more likely to become pregnant less than 24 months after delivery. They had a cumulative risk of pregnancy of 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.43) as compared with 12% (95% CI 0.05-0.18) for women with no barrier. All but three of the women reporting an unintended pregnancy had earlier expressed interest in using long-acting reversible contraception or a permanent method.
CONCLUSION: In this study, most unintended pregnancies less than 24 months after delivery could have been prevented or postponed had women been able to access their desired long-acting and permanent methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26942356      PMCID: PMC4780343          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


  27 in total

1.  Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Shanna Cox; Naomi K Tepper; Kathryn M Curtis; Denise J Jamieson; Ana Penman-Aguilar; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez; Ana Cecilia Kafury-Goeta
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.

Authors:  Joseph A Tony Ogburn; Eve Espey; Jody Stonehocker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Frustrated demand for sterilization among low-income Latinas in El Paso, Texas.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Sarah McKinnon; Michele G Shedlin; Jon Amastae; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-10-11

6.  Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?

Authors:  Kristina M Tocce; Jeanelle L Sheeder; Stephanie B Teal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Factors influencing uptake of intrauterine devices among postpartum adolescents: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Melissa R S Weston; Summer L Martins; Amy B Neustadt; Melissa L Gilliam
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Torri Janecek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Daria P Rostovtseva; Claire D Brindis; M Antonia Biggs; Denis Hulett; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Cynthia M Klaisle; Maya Blum; Mary E Bradsberry; Claire D Brindis; Felicia H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  11 in total

1.  Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Prevalence and Predictors of Prenatal and Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling in Two Texas Cities.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Abigail R A Aiken; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-06-27

3.  Contraception After Delivery Among Publicly Insured Women in Texas: Use Compared With Preference.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kari White; Daniel A Powers; Chloe Dillaway; Amanda J Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Contraceptive method preferences and provision after termination of pregnancy: a population-based analysis of women obtaining care with the British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; P A Lohr; C E Aiken; T Forsyth; J Trussell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Mi Familia Entera: Contraceptive Use Among Spanish-Speaking Mothers of Young Children.

Authors:  Tania Maria Caballero; Laura Bou Delgado; Linxuan Wu; Krishna Upadhya; Sara B Johnson; Lisa R DeCamp
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Association of the affordable care act Medicaid expansions with postpartum contraceptive use and early postpartum pregnancy.

Authors:  Erica L Eliason; Amanda Spishak-Thomas; Maria W Steenland
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Perceptions and practice of state Medicaid officials regarding informed consent for female sterilization.

Authors:  Heather Bouma-Johnston; Roselle Ponsaran; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Patients' Experiences with an Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Program.

Authors:  Cristina Wallace Huff; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-12-13

9.  A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sadia Haider; Cynthia Stoffel; Kristin Rankin; Keriann Uesugi; Arden Handler; Rachel Caskey
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-01-19

Review 10.  Recent developments have made female permanent contraception an increasingly attractive option, and pregnant women in particular ought to be counselled about it.

Authors:  Douwe A A Verkuyl
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.