Literature DB >> 28661910

Determination of Reynolds Shear Stress Level for Hemolysis.

Choon-Sik Jhun, Megan A Stauffer, John D Reibson, Eric E Yeager, Raymond K Newswanger, Joshua O Taylor, Keefe B Manning, William J Weiss, Gerson Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Reynolds shear stress (RSS) has served as a metric for the effect of turbulence on hemolysis. Forstrom (1969) and Sallam and Hwang (1984) determined the RSS threshold for hemolysis to be 50,000 and 4,000 dyne/cm, respectively, using a turbulent jet. Despite the order of magnitude discrepancy, the threshold by Sallam and Hwang has been frequently cited for hemolytic potential in blood pumps. We recreated a Sallam apparatus (SA) to resolve this discrepancy and provide additional data to be used in developing a more accurate hemolysis model. Hemolysis was measured over a large range of Reynolds numbers (Re) (Re = 1,000-80,000). Washed bovine red blood cells (RBCs) were injected into the free jet of phosphate buffered saline, and hemolysis was quantified using a percent hemolysis, Hp = h (100 - hematocrit [HCT])/Hb, where h (mg/dl) is free hemoglobin and Hb (mg/dl) is total hemoglobin. Reynolds shear stress was calculated using two-dimensional laser Doppler velocimetry. Reynolds shear stress of ≥30,000 dyne/cm corresponding to Re of ≥60,000 appeared to cause hemolysis (p < 0.05). This RSS is an order of magnitude greater than the RSS threshold that Sallam and Hwang suggested, and it is similar to Forstrom's RSS threshold. This study resolved a long-standing uncertainty regarding the critical values of RSS for hemolysis and may provide a foundation for a more accurate hemolysis model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28661910      PMCID: PMC5732101          DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  30 in total

1.  A discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis related to Reynolds shear stress.

Authors:  M Grigioni; C Daniele; G D'Avenio; V Barbaro
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Turbulence characteristics downstream of bileaflet aortic valve prostheses.

Authors:  J S Liu; P C Lu; S H Chu
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Deformation and fragmentation of human red blood cells in turbulent shear flow.

Authors:  S P Sutera; M H Mehrjardi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Prediction of hemolysis in turbulent shear orifice flow.

Authors:  M Tamagawa; T Akamatsu; K Saitoh
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.094

5.  LDA measurements of mean velocity and Reynolds stress fields within an artificial heart ventricle.

Authors:  J T Baldwin; S Deutsch; D B Geselowitz; J M Tarbell
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Red blood cell hemolysis during processing.

Authors:  Samuel O Sowemimo-Coker
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2002-01

7.  Shear, wall interaction and hemolysis.

Authors:  P L Blackshear; F D Dorman; J H Steinbach; E J Maybach; A Singh; R E Collingham
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1966

8.  Evaluation of Eulerian and Lagrangian models for hemolysis estimation.

Authors:  M Ertan Taskin; Katharine H Fraser; Tao Zhang; Changfu Wu; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Plasma protective effect on red blood cells exposed to mechanical stress.

Authors:  M V Kameneva; J F Antaki; K K Yeleswarapu; M J Watach; B P Griffith; H S Borovetz
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Comparative Study of Continuous and Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Hemodynamics of a Pediatric End-to-Side Anastomotic Graft.

Authors:  Ning Yang; Steven Deutsch; Eric G Paterson; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.495

View more
  4 in total

1.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow in the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Geometry to Predict Hemolysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Tobin; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Dynamics of Blood Flows in Aortic Stenosis: Mild, Moderate, and Severe.

Authors:  Choon-Sik Jhun; Raymond Newswanger; Joshua P Cysyk; Sailahari Ponnaluri; Bryan Good; Keefe B Manning; Gerson Rosenberg
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.826

3.  Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.

Authors:  M G Friedrich; T Tirilomis; J M Kollmeier; Y Wang; G G Hanekop
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21

4.  Haemolysis induced by mechanical circulatory support devices: unsolved problems.

Authors:  Inge Köhne
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.