Literature DB >> 28660807

Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?

Jerald Silverman1, Charles W Lidz1,2, Jonathan Clayfield2, Alexandra Murray2, Lorna J Simon2, Louise Maranda1.   

Abstract

Decisions about the appropriate use of animals in research are largely made by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). Several commentators claim that scientists exert excessive influence on IACUC decisions. We studied 87 protocol reviews from 10 IACUCs to assess whether any group of participants appeared to dominate the protocol discussions. Audio recordings of the meetings were coded to capture the topics of the discussions. We found that animal research scientists made the largest total number of topic mentions while community members made the fewest. On a per person basis, chairpersons and attending veterinarians made the most mentions. Scientists presented the largest number of protocols, and the subsequent discussions tended to contain the same topics mentioned in the presentations. The large number of protocols presented by scientists and their total number of comments made during protocol discussions suggest that scientists may significantly influence IACUC decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IACUCs; federal regulations; qualitative methods; research ethics; research review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28660807      PMCID: PMC5595641          DOI: 10.1177/1556264617717827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  18 in total

1.  Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values?

Authors:  H Häyry
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1998

Review 2.  Ethical decision making about animal experiments.

Authors:  F Barbara Orlans
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  1997

3.  The refining influence of ethics committees on animal experimentation in Sweden.

Authors:  Joakim Hagelin; Jann Hau; Hans-Erik Carlsson
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Recognizing and assessing pain, suffering and distress in laboratory animals: a survey of current practice in the UK with recommendations.

Authors:  Penny Hawkins
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Animal ethical evaluation: an observational study of Canadian IACUCs.

Authors:  Lise Houde; Claude Dumas; Therese Leroux
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2003

6.  The interpretation and application of the three Rs by animal ethics committee members.

Authors:  Catherine A Schuppli; David Fraser
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Information sampling and group decision making: the effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience.

Authors:  Tobias Greitemeyer; Stefan Schulz-Hardt; Felix C Brodbeck; Dieter Frey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2006-03

8.  Trust and regulatory organisations: the role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review.

Authors:  Adam M Hedgecoe
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.885

9.  Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan C Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Richard G Rondeau
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity.

Authors:  Lawrence Arthur Hansen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.

Authors:  Madeline L Budda; Stacy L Pritt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Comparing human and mouse salivary glands: A practice guide for salivary researchers.

Authors:  C L Maruyama; M M Monroe; J P Hunt; L Buchmann; O J Baker
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.511

3.  Protecting Canada's Lab Animals: The Need for Legislation.

Authors:  Vaughan Black; Andrew Fenton; Elisabeth H Ormandy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.