| Literature DB >> 28660807 |
Jerald Silverman1, Charles W Lidz1,2, Jonathan Clayfield2, Alexandra Murray2, Lorna J Simon2, Louise Maranda1.
Abstract
Decisions about the appropriate use of animals in research are largely made by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). Several commentators claim that scientists exert excessive influence on IACUC decisions. We studied 87 protocol reviews from 10 IACUCs to assess whether any group of participants appeared to dominate the protocol discussions. Audio recordings of the meetings were coded to capture the topics of the discussions. We found that animal research scientists made the largest total number of topic mentions while community members made the fewest. On a per person basis, chairpersons and attending veterinarians made the most mentions. Scientists presented the largest number of protocols, and the subsequent discussions tended to contain the same topics mentioned in the presentations. The large number of protocols presented by scientists and their total number of comments made during protocol discussions suggest that scientists may significantly influence IACUC decision making.Entities:
Keywords: IACUCs; federal regulations; qualitative methods; research ethics; research review
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28660807 PMCID: PMC5595641 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617717827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742