Literature DB >> 12626068

The refining influence of ethics committees on animal experimentation in Sweden.

Joakim Hagelin1, Jann Hau, Hans-Erik Carlsson.   

Abstract

Mandatory scrutiny of projects by animal ethics committees was introduced in Sweden in 1979. The present study investigated the minutes of meetings held between 1989 and 2000 at which consideration of applications for experimental work in animals resulted in requests for modification (n = 3607). 18.1% of the applications received were approved only after modifications. The majority of the changes requested may be classified as 'Refinement'. The most common requests were for improvement of project design, euthanasia method and housing and husbandry. There was a relative increase in modifications requested by the committees related to anaesthesia, choice of licensed supervisor and the need for licenses or informed consent from animal owners during the period investigated. There was a relative decrease in modifications related to euthanasia, housing and husbandry, and general endpoint assertions. The results suggest that the work of the committees may be perceived as an ongoing process, since several of the applications for which modification was requested were projects that had been approved on a previous occasion but were now up for renewal. In order to have maximal influence on the refinement of scientific protocols it is important that the scientists in the committees are continuously updated on developments in laboratory animal science.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12626068     DOI: 10.1258/002367703762226656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  10 in total

1.  Legislation, social licence and primate research.

Authors:  I Anna S Olsson; Augusto Vitale
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Louise Maranda
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan C Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Richard G Rondeau
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process.

Authors:  Orsolya Varga
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Analysis of Animal Research Ethics Committee Membership at American Institutions.

Authors:  Lawrence A Hansen; Justin R Goodman; Alka Chandna
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Ethics of animal research in human disease remediation, its institutional teaching; and alternatives to animal experimentation.

Authors:  Rajkumar Cheluvappa; Paul Scowen; Rajaraman Eri
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  The dark side of the animal experiments.

Authors:  Elif Akkaya; Harun Reşit Güngör
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 8.  Animal welfare in studies on murine tuberculosis: assessing progress over a 12-year period and the need for further improvement.

Authors:  Nuno Henrique Franco; Margarida Correia-Neves; I Anna S Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making in Animal Ethics Committees.

Authors:  Elisabeth Tjärnström; Elin M Weber; Jan Hultgren; Helena Röcklinsberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden.

Authors:  Svea Jörgensen; Johan Lindsjö; Elin M Weber; Helena Röcklinsberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.