Literature DB >> 23189609

Trust and regulatory organisations: the role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review.

Adam M Hedgecoe1.   

Abstract

While trust is seen as central to most social relations, most writers, including sociologists of science, assume that modern trust relations--especially those in regulatory relationships - tend towards the impersonal. Drawing on ethnographic material from one kind of scientific oversight body--research ethics committees based in the UK NHS--this paper argues that interpersonal trust is crucial to regulatory decision-making and intimately bound up with the way in which these oversight bodies work, and that as such they build on, rather than challenge, the trust-based nature of the scientific community.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23189609     DOI: 10.1177/0306312712446364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Stud Sci        ISSN: 0306-3127            Impact factor:   3.885


  11 in total

1.  Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Louise Maranda
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; Charles W Lidz; Jonathan C Clayfield; Alexandra Murray; Lorna J Simon; Richard G Rondeau
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review.

Authors:  Samantha Trace; Simon Erik Kolstoe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Multiple-level stakeholder engagement in malaria clinical trials: addressing the challenges of conducting clinical research in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  George Mtove; Joshua Kimani; William Kisinza; Geofrey Makenga; Peter Mangesho; Stephan Duparc; Miriam Nakalembe; Kamija S Phiri; Russell Orrico; Ricardo Rojo; Pol Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Decisions of Value: Going Backstage Comment on "Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis".

Authors:  Michael Calnan
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-11-01

6.  Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  How ethics committees and requirements are structuring health research in the Philippines: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gideon Lasco; Vincen Gregory Yu; Lia Palileo-Villanueva
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review.

Authors:  Adam Hedgecoe
Journal:  Sociology       Date:  2015-06-25

9.  The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data.

Authors:  Gabrielle Samuel; Gemma E Derrick; Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2019-02-07

10.  Ethics review, reflective equilibrium and reflexivity.

Authors:  Julie Morton
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.874

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.