Literature DB >> 28660330

Quantitative MRI of kidneys in renal disease.

Timothy L Kline1, Marie E Edwards2, Ishan Garg3, Maria V Irazabal2, Panagiotis Korfiatis3, Peter C Harris2, Bernard F King3, Vicente E Torres2, Sudhakar K Venkatesh3, Bradley J Erickson3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility and utility of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for the assessment of kidneys in young adults with normal renal function (eGFR ranged from 90 to 130 mL/min/1.73 m2) and patients with early renal disease (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective case-control study was performed on ten normal young adults (18-30 years old) and ten age- and sex-matched patients with early renal parenchymal disease (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease). All subjects underwent a comprehensive kidney MRI protocol, including qualitative imaging: T1w, T2w, FIESTA, and quantitative imaging: 2D cine phase contrast of the renal arteries, and parenchymal diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), magnetization transfer imaging (MTI), blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) imaging, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). The normal controls were imaged on two separate occasions ≥24 h apart (range 24-210 h) to assess reproducibility of the measurements.
RESULTS: Quantitative MR imaging sequences were found to be reproducible. The mean ± SD absolute percent difference between quantitative parameters measured ≥24 h apart were: MTI-derived ratio = 4.5 ± 3.6%, DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) = 6.5 ± 3.4%, BOLD-derived R2* = 7.4 ± 5.9%, and MRE-derived tissue stiffness = 7.6 ± 3.3%. Compared with controls, the ADPKD patient's non-cystic renal parenchyma (NCRP) had statistically significant differences with regard to quantitative parenchymal measures: lower MTI percent ratios (16.3 ± 4.4 vs. 23.8 ± 1.2, p < 0.05), higher ADCs (2.46 ± 0.20 vs. 2.18 ± 0.10 × 10-3 mm2/s, p < 0.05), lower R2*s (14.9 ± 1.7 vs. 18.1 ± 1.6 s-1, p < 0.05), and lower tissue stiffness (3.2 ± 0.3 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5 kPa, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Excellent reproducibility of the quantitative measurements was obtained in all cases. Significantly different quantitative MR parenchymal measurement parameters between ADPKD patients and normal controls were obtained by MT, DWI, BOLD, and MRE indicating the potential for detecting and following renal disease at an earlier stage than the conventional qualitative imaging techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging; Segmentation; Total kidney volume

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28660330      PMCID: PMC5745297          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1236-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  24 in total

1.  Quantitation of renal perfusion using arterial spin labeling with FAIR-UFLARE.

Authors:  N Karger; J Biederer; S Lüsse; J Grimm; J Steffens; M Heller; C Glüer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Comparative physiology of the kidney.

Authors:  H W SMITH
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1953-12-26

3.  Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Vivian S Lee; Elizabeth Hecht; Bachir Taouli; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer; Raymond H Oyen; Ronald R Peeters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Angiotensin II sensitivity is associated with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor A(1166)C polymorphism in essential hypertensives on a high sodium diet.

Authors:  W Spiering; A A Kroon; M M Fuss-Lejeune; M J Daemen; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Josef Coresh; Brad C Astor; Geraldine McQuillan; John Kusek; Tom Greene; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  MRI-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model.

Authors:  Steven P Sourbron; Henrik J Michaely; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Magnetic resonance measurements of renal blood flow and disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Vicente E Torres; Bernard F King; Arlene B Chapman; Marijn E Brummer; Kyongtae T Bae; James F Glockner; Kraisthith Arya; Dana Risk; Joel P Felmlee; Jared J Grantham; Lisa M Guay-Woodford; William M Bennett; Saulo Klahr; Catherine M Meyers; Xiaoling Zhang; Paul A Thompson; J Philip Miller
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Mapping murine diabetic kidney disease using chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI.

Authors:  Feng Wang; David Kopylov; Zhongliang Zu; Keiko Takahashi; Suwan Wang; C Chad Quarles; John C Gore; Raymond C Harris; Takamune Takahashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  10 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Application of MR Imaging Features in Differentiation of Renal Changes in Patients With Stage III Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy and Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Baoting Yu; Chencui Huang; Xiaofei Fan; Feng Li; Jianzhong Zhang; Zihan Song; Nan Zhi; Jun Ding
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 3.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

4.  Assessing Polycystic Kidney Disease in Rodents: Comparison of Robotic 3D Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Nathan J Beaumont; Heather L Holmes; Adriana V Gregory; Marie E Edwards; Juan D Rojas; Ryan C Gessner; Paul A Dayton; Timothy L Kline; Michael F Romero; Tomasz J Czernuszewicz
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 5.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging to assess renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper.

Authors:  Giulia Villa; Steffen Ringgaard; Ingo Hermann; Rebecca Noble; Paolo Brambilla; Dinah S Khatir; Frank G Zöllner; Susan T Francis; Nicholas M Selby; Andrea Remuzzi; Anna Caroli
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess diffuse renal pathology: a systematic review and statement paper.

Authors:  Anna Caroli; Moritz Schneider; Iris Friedli; Alexandra Ljimani; Sophie De Seigneux; Peter Boor; Latha Gullapudi; Isma Kazmi; Iosif A Mendichovszky; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Nicholas M Selby; Harriet C Thoeny; Nicolas Grenier; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Change in kidney volume after kidney transplantation in patients with autosomal polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Massimiliano Veroux; Cecilia Gozzo; Daniela Corona; Paolo Murabito; Daniele Carmelo Caltabiano; Luca Mammino; Alessia Giaquinta; Domenico Zerbo; Nunziata Sinagra; Pierfrancesco Veroux; Stefano Palmucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The feasibility of b-value maps based on threshold DWI for detection of breast cancer: A case-control STROBE compliant study.

Authors:  Na Zhao; Chao Ma; Xiaolong Ye; Nimpagaritse Danie; Caixia Fu; Qiang Hao; Jianping Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Application of multiparametric MR imaging to predict the diversification of renal function in miR29a-mediated diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Chia-Hao Su; Yung-Chien Hsu; Suresh Thangudu; Wei-Yu Chen; Yu-Ting Huang; Chun-Chieh Yu; Ya-Hsueh Shih; Ching-Jen Wang; Chun-Liang Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test-Retest Repeatability Study.

Authors:  Anneloes de Boer; Anita A Harteveld; Bjorn Stemkens; Peter J Blankestijn; Clemens Bos; Suzanne L Franklin; Martijn Froeling; Jaap A Joles; Marianne C Verhaar; Nico van den Berg; Hans Hoogduin; Tim Leiner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.