Literature DB >> 28660324

[R1 resection for gastric carcinoma].

K Ridwelski1,2, J Fahlke3, M Huß3, R Otto4, S Wolff4,5.   

Abstract

The results reported in the literature in the context of an R1 situation for a resected gastric carcinoma are not uniform. An R1 situation worsens the prognosis for the long-term survival of patients. This is significant especially for low T stages and lymph node metastasis with 0-≤3 lymph node metastases. In higher tumor stages with extensive lymph node metastases, the survival difference between R0 and R1 resections is lower and frequently no longer significant. The frequency of R1 resection is approximately 5% (range 1.8-9%) and for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG tumors)> 10%. The data are mainly related to the oral and aboral resection line but there are only a few specifications on the circumferential margin. The risk of an infiltrated resection line increases with the size of the tumor (>5 cm), T3+4 and pN2/pN3 stages. Poorly differentiated signet ring cell or mucinous adenocarcinomas and carcinomas of the Bormann type 3+4 also lead to an increased R1 rate. In order to achieve an R0 resection, an intraoperative frozen section is the standard approach. Immediate reoperation should be performed in the case of tumor infiltration. If an R1 resection is detected only in the definitive histology, surgical re-excision to achieve an R0 resection is the standard approach in publications. Nevertheless, a reoperation is rare. Only 1 study showed 122 patients with 100% re-operations, which were successfully performed in 50 patients (41% R0). For the R0 group, median survival was extended from 18 months to 23 months. There are only sporadic literature data and no evidence for postoperative additive treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative frozen section; Long-term survival; Prognosis; Reoperation; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28660324     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0460-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  28 in total

1.  No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margins in node positive gastric cancer patients?

Authors:  T Sano; S S Mudan
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margin in advanced gastric cancer patients after gastric resection.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Woo; Keun Won Ryu; Ji Yeon Park; Bang Wool Eom; Mi Jung Kim; Hong Man Yoon; Sook Ryun Park; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Il Ju Choi; Young-Woo Kim; Young-Iee Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of the extent of surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy on recurrence patterns in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Johan L Dikken; Edwin P M Jansen; Annemieke Cats; Berdine Bakker; Henk H Hartgrink; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Henk Boot; Hein Putter; Koen C M J Peeters; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Marcel Verheij
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognostic improvement of reexcision for positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  J-D Chen; X-P Yang; J-G Shen; W-X Hu; X-M Yuan; L-B Wang
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Clinical impact of tumor infiltration at the transected surgical margin during gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ju-Hee Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Intraoperative frozen section margin evaluation in gastric cancer of the cardia surgery.

Authors:  Jian Guo Shen; Jae Ho Cheong; Woo Jin Hyung; Junuk Kim; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

7.  Accuracy, utility, and cost of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  L J DiNardo; J Lin; L S Karageorge; C N Powers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Prognostic value of surgical margin status in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuexiang Liang; Xuewei Ding; Xiaona Wang; Baogui Wang; Jingyu Deng; Li Zhang; Han Liang
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan Spicer; Cassandre Benay; Laurence Lee; Mathieu Rousseau; Amin Andalib; Yael Kushner; Victoria Marcus; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival.

Authors:  S H Kim; M S Karpeh; D S Klimstra; D Leung; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Population-Based Study on Risk Factors for Tumor-Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Leonie R van der Werf; Charlotte Cords; Ivo Arntz; Eric J T Belt; Ivan M Cherepanin; Peter-Paul L O Coene; Erwin van der Harst; Joos Heisterkamp; Barbara S Langenhoff; Bas Lamme; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 5.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.