Yuexiang Liang1, Xuewei Ding1, Xiaona Wang1, Baogui Wang1, Jingyu Deng1, Li Zhang1, Han Liang1. 1. Department of Gastric Cancer, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjing City, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that positive surgical margin is one of the most significant risk factors for local recurrence and poor survival. However, the survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients with positive margin is still controversial. METHODS: A total of 1025 stage I-III GC patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2003 and April 2008 in our centre were enrolled in this study, of whom, 75 patients got a microscopic positive resection margin. Other 950 patients with negative resection margin were used for comparison. RESULTS: Borrmann type and extranodal metastasis were independent risk factors for positive margin. The 5-year overall survival for the patients with positive margin is merely 13.3%. Survival in such patients was similar to that of the patients staged IIIc with R0 resection. In multivariate analysis, surgical margin status was found to be an independent prognostic factor for GC patients, while histology, tumour location, TNM stage and chemotherapy were independently associated with overall survival for patients with positive margin. CONCLUSION: Surgical margin status is an independent prognostic factor for GC. Patients with positive margin have a poor prognosis, similar to that of IIIc stage disease. When the tumour demonstrates infiltrative growth pattern (Borrmann type III and IV) and the surgical margin status is difficult to determine, extended gastrectomy should be implemented to ensure an R0 resection. Those high-risk patients should be considered for postoperative chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that positive surgical margin is one of the most significant risk factors for local recurrence and poor survival. However, the survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients with positive margin is still controversial. METHODS: A total of 1025 stage I-III GC patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2003 and April 2008 in our centre were enrolled in this study, of whom, 75 patients got a microscopic positive resection margin. Other 950 patients with negative resection margin were used for comparison. RESULTS: Borrmann type and extranodal metastasis were independent risk factors for positive margin. The 5-year overall survival for the patients with positive margin is merely 13.3%. Survival in such patients was similar to that of the patients staged IIIc with R0 resection. In multivariate analysis, surgical margin status was found to be an independent prognostic factor for GC patients, while histology, tumour location, TNM stage and chemotherapy were independently associated with overall survival for patients with positive margin. CONCLUSION: Surgical margin status is an independent prognostic factor for GC. Patients with positive margin have a poor prognosis, similar to that of IIIc stage disease. When the tumour demonstrates infiltrative growth pattern (Borrmann type III and IV) and the surgical margin status is difficult to determine, extended gastrectomy should be implemented to ensure an R0 resection. Those high-risk patients should be considered for postoperative chemotherapy.
Authors: Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Leonie R van der Werf; Charlotte Cords; Ivo Arntz; Eric J T Belt; Ivan M Cherepanin; Peter-Paul L O Coene; Erwin van der Harst; Joos Heisterkamp; Barbara S Langenhoff; Bas Lamme; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Bas P L Wijnhoven Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Shun Zhang; Dongyi Yan; Qi Sun; Tao Du; Dongliang Cao; Yao Yang; Biao Yuan; Haiqiang Li; Xiaohua Jiang; Chun Song Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-05-29