Literature DB >> 28658874

MR Imaging of Rotator Cuff Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy.

Gururaj Sharma1, Sudarshan Bhandary2, Ganesh Khandige3, Utkarsh Kabra4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tears are quite common and can cause significant disability. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has now emerged as the modality of choice in the preoperative evaluation of patients with rotator cuff injuries, in view of its improved inherent soft tissue contrast and resolution. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine MRI in the detection and characterisation of rotator cuff tears, by correlating the findings with arthroscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between July 2014 and August 2016 at the AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. A total of 82 patients were diagnosed with rotator cuff injury on MRI during this period, out of which 45 patients who underwent further evaluation with arthroscopy were included in this study. The data collected was analysed for significant correlation between MRI diagnosis and arthroscopic findings using kappa statistics. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of full and partial thickness tears were calculated using arthroscopic findings as the reference standard.
RESULTS: There were 27 males and 18 females in this study. The youngest patient was 22 years and the oldest was 74 years. Majority of rotator cuff tears (78%) were seen in patients above the age of 40 years. MRI showed a sensitivity of 89.6%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 83.3% for the diagnosis of full thickness rotator cuff tears. For partial thickness tears, MRI showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 86.6%, positive predictive value of 78.9% and negative predictive value of 100%. The accuracy was 93.1% for full thickness tears and 91.1% for partial thickness tears. The p-value was less than 0.01 for both full and partial thickness tears. There was good agreement between the MRI and arthroscopic findings, with kappa value of 0.85 for full thickness tears and 0.81 for partial thickness tears.
CONCLUSION: MRI revealed high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears with accuracy of 93.1% for full thickness tears and 91.1% for partial thickness tears. MRI provides useful information about the size and extent of the tear, involvement of adjacent structures, presence of muscle atrophy and tendon retraction, all of which have important therapeutic and prognostic implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Full thickness; Partial thickness; Shoulder joint

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658874      PMCID: PMC5483776          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27714.9911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  13 in total

1.  Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair.

Authors:  J F James Davidson; Stephen S Burkhart; David P Richards; Scot E Campbell
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  MR imaging of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Ara Kassarjian; Jenny T Bencardino; William E Palmer
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph O de Jesus; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  MRI of the rotator cuff and internal derangement.

Authors:  Oleg Opsha; Archana Malik; Romulo Baltazar; Denis Primakov; Salvador Beltran; Theodore T Miller; Javier Beltran
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Correlation between MRI and Arthroscopy in Diagnosis of Shoulder Pathology.

Authors:  Abhinav Bhatnagar; Sachin Bhonsle; Sonu Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care.

Authors:  A J K Ostör; C A Richards; A T Prevost; C A Speed; B L Hazleman
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 7.  MR imaging of rotator cuff injury: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  Yoav Morag; Jon A Jacobson; Bruce Miller; Michel De Maeseneer; Gandikota Girish; David Jamadar
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Association of sonographically detected subacromial/subdeltoid bursal effusion and intraarticular fluid with rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  M S Hollister; L A Mack; R M Patten; T C Winter; F A Matsen; R R Veith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears.

Authors:  Daniel Goutallier; Jean-Marie Postel; Pascal Gleyze; Pierre Leguilloux; Stéphane Van Driessche
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamamoto; Kenji Takagishi; Toshihisa Osawa; Takashi Yanagawa; Daisuke Nakajima; Hitoshi Shitara; Tsutomu Kobayashi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  10 in total

1.  Application of deep learning-based image reconstruction in MR imaging of the shoulder joint to improve image quality and reduce scan time.

Authors:  Malwina Kaniewska; Eva Deininger-Czermak; Jonas M Getzmann; Xinzeng Wang; Maelene Lohezic; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  3D cell-printing of gradient multi-tissue interfaces for rotator cuff regeneration.

Authors:  Suhun Chae; Uijung Yong; Wonbin Park; Yoo-Mi Choi; In-Ho Jeon; Homan Kang; Jinah Jang; Hak Soo Choi; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Evidence-Based Physical Examination for the Diagnosis of Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew Dakkak; Michael K Krill; Matthew L Krill; Benedict Nwachukwu; Frank McCormick
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Accuracy and reliability of MRI-reports to determine which shoulder is symptomatic for workers compensation patients with unilateral symptoms.

Authors:  Emily Boersma; Tom Crijns; Maria Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Michael Edwards; David Ring; Stein Janssen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-27

5.  7-T clinical MRI of the shoulder in patients with suspected lesions of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik-Palm; Oliver Kraff; Stefan H G Rietsch; Mark E Ladd; Michael Kamminga; Sascha Beck; Harald H Quick; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-02-07

6.  Evaluation of a New Rotator Cuff Trainer Based on Oscillating Hydraulic Damping.

Authors:  Yinghao Wang; Jianfeng Wu; Hongchun Yang; Zhichuan Tang; Guozhong Chai
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28

7.  Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament (IGHL) Injuries: A Case Series of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging Findings and Arthroscopic Correlation.

Authors:  Michael Glass; Vafa Behzadpour; Jessica Peterson; Lauren Clark; Shelby Bell-Glenn; Yonghui Ni; Carissa Walter; Nebiyu Beteselassie
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-11-24

8.  Comparing shoulder maneuvers to magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in patients with supraspinatus tears.

Authors:  Fabio Anauate Nicolao; Joao Alberto Yazigi Junior; Fabio Teruo Matsunaga; Nicola Archetti Netto; Joao Carlos Belloti; Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Assessing the accuracy of arthroscopic and open measurements of the size of rotator cuff tears: A simulation-based study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kitridis; Dimosthenis Alaseirlis; Nikolaos Malliaropoulos; Byron Chalidis; Patrick McMahon; Richard Debski; Panagiotis Givissis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-12-18

10.  Do subscapularis tears really result in superior humeral migration?

Authors:  Mehmet Cetinkaya; Muhammet Baybars Ataoglu; Mustafa Ozer; Tacettin Ayanoglu; Ali Yusuf Oner; Ulunay Kanatli
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.