Sps Gill1, Ankit Mittal2, Manish Raj2, Pulkesh Singh2, Jasveer Singh2, Santosh Kumar2. 1. Professor and Head, Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite recent evolution in the operating techniques and surgical implants, debate continues around the choice of implant for management of distal femur fractures. High rates of complications and union difficulties continues to make them a momentous therapeutic challenge. AIM: To compare the outcome of locked compressive plating versus retrograde nailing in the management of extra articular supracondylar femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized prospective study, 42 patients with extra-articular distal femur fractures were segregated into two groups based on internal fixation with distal femoral locking plate (n=22) and retrograde nail (n=20). Clinical and radiological parameters were studied and functional evaluation was done at 18 months with KSS score. RESULTS: A significant difference in terms of mean duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss was discerned in favour of plating group although complication rates were equivalent between the groups. Mean duration until union was 26.5 weeks (SD=12.9; range 12 to 64 weeks) in the locked plating and 22.6 weeks (SD=13.1: range 12 to 60 weeks) in the retrograde nail group. The difference came out to be statistically insignificant. Fractures in nailed patients united earlier but the difference was not statistically significant with similar overall union rates. Functional scores too were comparable between them. We deduce that surgical planning and expertise rather than the choice of implant are more crucial for optimal results. CONCLUSION:Nailing proved more cumbersome intraoperatively due to escalated operating time and blood loss and successive anterior knee pain necessitating implant removal but this detriment may be offset by an inclination towards earlier union. With Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS), technical errors are more common and less forgiving and must be overcome with proper preoperative planning and intraoperative attention to detail.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Despite recent evolution in the operating techniques and surgical implants, debate continues around the choice of implant for management of distal femur fractures. High rates of complications and union difficulties continues to make them a momentous therapeutic challenge. AIM: To compare the outcome of locked compressive plating versus retrograde nailing in the management of extra articular supracondylar femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized prospective study, 42 patients with extra-articular distal femur fractures were segregated into two groups based on internal fixation with distal femoral locking plate (n=22) and retrograde nail (n=20). Clinical and radiological parameters were studied and functional evaluation was done at 18 months with KSS score. RESULTS: A significant difference in terms of mean duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss was discerned in favour of plating group although complication rates were equivalent between the groups. Mean duration until union was 26.5 weeks (SD=12.9; range 12 to 64 weeks) in the locked plating and 22.6 weeks (SD=13.1: range 12 to 60 weeks) in the retrograde nail group. The difference came out to be statistically insignificant. Fractures in nailed patients united earlier but the difference was not statistically significant with similar overall union rates. Functional scores too were comparable between them. We deduce that surgical planning and expertise rather than the choice of implant are more crucial for optimal results. CONCLUSION: Nailing proved more cumbersome intraoperatively due to escalated operating time and blood loss and successive anterior knee pain necessitating implant removal but this detriment may be offset by an inclination towards earlier union. With Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS), technical errors are more common and less forgiving and must be overcome with proper preoperative planning and intraoperative attention to detail.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone nails; Bone plates; Femur; Fracture fixation; Internal; Intramedullary; Prospective studies
Authors: Christopher E Henderson; Trevor J Lujan; Lori L Kuhl; Michael Bottlang; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; John L Marsh Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Michael Zlowodzki; Scott Williamson; Peter A Cole; Lyle D Zardiackas; Philip J Kregor Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: William M Ricci; Philipp N Streubel; Saam Morshed; Cory A Collinge; Sean E Nork; Michael J Gardner Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Jaclyn M Jankowski; Patrick F Szukics; Jay K Shah; David M Keller; Robinson E Pires; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 1.251
Authors: Giuseppe Rollo; Michele Bisaccia; Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Auro Caraffa; Valerio Pace; Javier Cervera Irimia; Enio de Cruto; Olga Bisaccia; Giuseppe Pica; Domiziano Tarantino; Luigi Meccariello Journal: Med Arch Date: 2019-06