Literature DB >> 28658022

Educational Technologies for Physician Continuous Professional Development: A National Survey.

David A Cook1, Morris J Blachman, David W Price, Colin P West, Barbara L Baasch Thomas, Richard A Berger, Christopher M Wittich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the past experiences with, current use of, and anticipated use of online learning and simulation-based education among practicing U.S. physicians, and how findings vary by age.
METHOD: The authors surveyed 4,648 randomly sampled board-certified U.S. physicians, September 2015 to April 2016, using Internet-based and paper questionnaires. Survey items (some optional) addressed past and current technology usage, perceived technology effectiveness, and anticipated future use of specific technology innovations.
RESULTS: Of 988 respondents, 444 completed optional items. Of these, 429/442 (97.1%) had used online learning and 372/442 (84.2%) had used simulation-based education in the past five years. Desire for more online learning was modest (mean [standard deviation], 4.6 [1.5]; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree), as was desire for more simulation-based education (4.2 [1.7]). Both online learning and simulation-based education were perceived as effective (5.2 [1.4]; 5.0 [1.4]). Physicians believed they possess adequate skills for online learning (5.8 [1.2]) and that point-of-care learning is vital to effective patient care (5.3 [1.3]). Only 39.0% used objective performance data to guide their learning choices, although 64.6% agreed that such information would be useful. The highest-rated innovations included a central repository for listing educational opportunities and tracking continuing education credits, an app to award credit for answering patient-focused questions, 5-minute and 20-minute clinical updates, and an e-mailed "question of the week." Responses to most survey items were similar across age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Practicing physicians generally seem receptive and prepared to use a variety of educational technologies, regardless of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28658022     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing a continuing medical education intervention in a primary health care setting.

Authors:  Teresa Reis; Inês Faria; Helena Serra; Miguel Xavier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Authors:  Douglas Archibald; Joseph K Burns; Michael Fitzgerald; Véronique French Merkley
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2020-04-23

3.  Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Authors:  Maureen O'Brien Pott; Anissa S Blanshan; Kelly M Huneke; Barbara L Baasch Thomas; David A Cook
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Home Health Management of Parkinson Disease Deep Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gordon Duffley; Barbara J Lutz; Aniko Szabo; Adrienne Wright; Christopher W Hess; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Pamela Zeilman; Shannon Chiu; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 29.907

5.  Simulation in the clinical setting: towards a standard lexicon.

Authors:  Glenn D Posner; Marcia L Clark; Vincent J Grant
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-09-20

6.  Simulation-Based Teaching of Telemedicine for Future Users of Teleconsultation and Tele-Expertise: Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Karim Chakroun; Benjamin Bouamra; Elisabeth Medeiros De Bustos; Jennifer Dobson; Jeanne-Antide Rouge; Thierry Moulin
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.