Gordon Duffley1,2, Barbara J Lutz3, Aniko Szabo4, Adrienne Wright5, Christopher W Hess5, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora5, Pamela Zeilman5, Shannon Chiu5, Kelly D Foote5, Michael S Okun5, Christopher R Butson1,2,5,6. 1. Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. 3. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington. 4. Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 5. Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville. 6. Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Abstract
Importance: The travel required to receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming causes substantial burden on patients and limits who can access DBS therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of home health DBS postoperative management in an effort to reduce travel burden and improve access. Design, Settings, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at University of Florida Health from November 2017 to April 2020. Eligible participants had a diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) and were scheduled to receive DBS independently of the study. Consenting participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care or home health postoperative DBS management for 6 months after surgery. Primary caregivers, usually spouses, were also enrolled to assess caregiver strain. Interventions: The home health postoperative management was conducted by a home health nurse who chose DBS settings with the aid of the iPad-based Mobile Application for PD DBS system. Prior to the study, the home health nurse had no experience providing DBS care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of times each patient traveled to the movement disorders clinic during the study period. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III. Results: Approximately 75 patients per year were scheduled for DBS. Of the patients who met inclusion criteria over the entire study duration, 45 either declined or were excluded for various reasons. Of the 44 patients enrolled, 19 of 21 randomized patients receiving the standard of care (mean [SD] age, 64.1 [10.0] years; 11 men) and 23 of 23 randomized patients receiving home health who underwent a minimum of 1 postoperative management visit (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [10.9] years; 13 men) were included in analysis. The primary outcome revealed that patients randomized to home health had significantly fewer clinic visits than the patients in the standard of care arm (mean [SD], 0.4 [0.8] visits vs 4.8 [0.4] visits; P < .001). We found no significant differences between the groups in the secondary outcomes measuring the efficacy of DBS. No adverse events occurred in association with the study procedure or devices. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence supporting the safety and feasibility of postoperative home health DBS management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02474459.
Importance: The travel required to receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming causes substantial burden on patients and limits who can access DBS therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of home health DBS postoperative management in an effort to reduce travel burden and improve access. Design, Settings, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at University of Florida Health from November 2017 to April 2020. Eligible participants had a diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) and were scheduled to receive DBS independently of the study. Consenting participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care or home health postoperative DBS management for 6 months after surgery. Primary caregivers, usually spouses, were also enrolled to assess caregiver strain. Interventions: The home health postoperative management was conducted by a home health nurse who chose DBS settings with the aid of the iPad-based Mobile Application for PD DBS system. Prior to the study, the home health nurse had no experience providing DBS care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of times each patient traveled to the movement disorders clinic during the study period. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III. Results: Approximately 75 patients per year were scheduled for DBS. Of the patients who met inclusion criteria over the entire study duration, 45 either declined or were excluded for various reasons. Of the 44 patients enrolled, 19 of 21 randomized patients receiving the standard of care (mean [SD] age, 64.1 [10.0] years; 11 men) and 23 of 23 randomized patients receiving home health who underwent a minimum of 1 postoperative management visit (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [10.9] years; 13 men) were included in analysis. The primary outcome revealed that patients randomized to home health had significantly fewer clinic visits than the patients in the standard of care arm (mean [SD], 0.4 [0.8] visits vs 4.8 [0.4] visits; P < .001). We found no significant differences between the groups in the secondary outcomes measuring the efficacy of DBS. No adverse events occurred in association with the study procedure or devices. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence supporting the safety and feasibility of postoperative home health DBS management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02474459.
Authors: David A Cook; Morris J Blachman; David W Price; Colin P West; Barbara L Baasch Thomas; Richard A Berger; Christopher M Wittich Journal: Acad Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Allison W Willis; Mario Schootman; Nathan Kung; Xiao-Yu Wang; Joel S Perlmutter; Brad A Racette Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: W M Michael Schüpbach; Stéphan Chabardes; Cordula Matthies; Claudio Pollo; Frank Steigerwald; Lars Timmermann; Veerle Visser Vandewalle; Jens Volkmann; P Richard Schuurman Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Braxton Osting; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Andreas Horn; Martin Reich; Johannes Vorwerk; Ningfei Li; Gregor Wenzel; Qianqian Fang; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Robert Nickl; Andreas Kupsch; Jens Volkmann; Andrea A Kühn; Michael D Fox Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Christopher L Pulliam; Dustin A Heldman; Tseganesh H Orcutt; Thomas O Mera; Joseph P Giuffrida; Jerrold L Vitek Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Jeff M Bronstein; Michele Tagliati; Ron L Alterman; Andres M Lozano; Jens Volkmann; Alessandro Stefani; Fay B Horak; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Paul Krack; Rajesh Pahwa; Jaimie M Henderson; Marwan I Hariz; Roy A Bakay; Ali Rezai; William J Marks; Elena Moro; Jerrold L Vitek; Frances M Weaver; Robert E Gross; Mahlon R DeLong Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-10-11
Authors: Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Jessica Frey; Jackson Cagle; Kara A Johnson; Joshua K Wong; Justin D Hilliard; Christopher R Butson; Michael S Okun; Coralie de Hemptinne Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.003