Literature DB >> 28655835

Use of a Single Baseline Versus Multiyear 24-Hour Urine Collection for Estimation of Long-Term Sodium Intake and Associated Cardiovascular and Renal Risk.

Rik H G Olde Engberink1, Thomas C van den Hoek1, Nicky D van Noordenne1, Bert-Jan H van den Born1, Hessel Peters-Sengers1, Liffert Vogt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A decrease in sodium intake has been shown to lower blood pressure, but data from cohort studies on the association with cardiovascular and renal outcomes are inconsistent. In these studies, sodium intake was often estimated with a single baseline measurement, which may be inaccurate considering day-to-day changes in sodium intake and sodium excretion. We compared the effects of single versus repetitive follow-up 24-hour urine samples on the relation between sodium intake and long-term cardiorenal outcomes.
METHODS: We selected adult subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73m2, an outpatient 24-hour urine sample between 1998 and 1999, and at least 1 collection during a 17-year follow-up. Sodium intake was estimated with a single baseline collection and the average of samples collected during a 1-, 5-, and 15-year follow-up. We used Cox regression analysis and the landmark approach to investigate the relation between sodium intake and cardiovascular (cardiovascular events or mortality) and renal (end-stage renal disease: dialysis, transplantation, and/or >60% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, or mortality) outcomes.
RESULTS: We included 574 subjects with 9776 twenty-four-hour urine samples. Average age was 47 years, and 46% were male. Median follow-up was 16.2 years. Average 24-hour sodium excretion, ranging from 3.8 to 3.9 g (165-170 mmol), was equal among all methods (P=0.88). However, relative to a single baseline measurement, 50% of the subjects had a >0.8-g (>34-mmol) difference in sodium intake with long-term estimations. As a result, 45%, 49%, and 50% of all subjects switched between tertiles of sodium intake when the 1-, 5-, or 15-year average was used, respectively. Consequently, hazard ratios for cardiorenal outcome changed up to 85% with the use of sodium intake estimations from short-term (1-year) and long-term (5-year) follow-up instead of baseline estimations.
CONCLUSIONS: Relative to a single baseline 24-hour sodium measurement, the use of subsequent 24-hour urine samples resulted in different estimations of an individual's sodium intake, whereas population averages remained similar. This finding had significant consequences for the association between sodium intake and long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular system; diet; epidemiology; kidney; prevention and control; sodium; urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28655835     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  37 in total

1.  Errors in estimating usual sodium intake by the Kawasaki formula alter its relationship with mortality: implications for public health.

Authors:  Feng J He; Norm R C Campbell; Yuan Ma; Graham A MacGregor; Mary E Cogswell; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Dietary Sodium Intake and Health Indicators: A Systematic Review of Published Literature between January 2015 and December 2019.

Authors:  Katherine J Overwyk; Zerleen S Quader; Joyce Maalouf; Marlana Bates; Jacqui Webster; Mary G George; Robert K Merritt; Mary E Cogswell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Agreement between 24-h dietary recalls and 24-h urine collections for estimating sodium intake in China, Japan, UK, USA: the International Study of Macro- and Micro-nutrients and Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Wen; Long Zhou; Jeremiah Stamler; Queenie Chan; Linda Van Horn; Martha L Daviglus; Alan R Dyer; Paul Elliott; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Katsuyuki Miura; Nagako Okuda; Yangfeng Wu; Liancheng Zhao
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Sodium Intake Reduction in Real World.

Authors:  Moo Yong Rhee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Estimation of salt intake and excretion in children in one region of Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Magali Rios-Leyvraz; Pascal Bovet; Murielle Bochud; Bernard Genin; Michel Russo; Michel F Rossier; René Tabin; Arnaud Chiolero
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Science of Salt: A regularly updated systematic review of salt and health outcomes studies (April to October 2018).

Authors:  Rachael M McLean; Kristina S Petersen; JoAnne Arcand; Daniela Malta; Sarah Rae; Sudhir Raj Thout; Kathy Trieu; Claire Johnson; Norman R C Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Shaking out the truth about salt.

Authors:  Michael F Jacobson; Norm R C Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  The International Consortium for Quality Research on Dietary Sodium/Salt (TRUE) position statement on the use of 24-hour, spot, and short duration (<24 hours) timed urine collections to assess dietary sodium intake.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell; Feng J He; Monique Tan; Francesco P Cappuccio; Bruce Neal; Mark Woodward; Mary E Cogswell; Rachael McLean; Joanne Arcand; Graham MacGregor; Paul Whelton; Antti Jula; Mary R L'Abbe; Laura K Cobb; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Reducing population salt intake-An update on latest evidence and global action.

Authors:  Feng J He; Mhairi Brown; Monique Tan; Graham A MacGregor
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Further evidence that methods based on spot urine samples should not be used to examine sodium-disease relationships from the Science of Salt: A regularly updated systematic review of salt and health outcomes (November 2018 to August 2019).

Authors:  Kristina S Petersen; Daniela Malta; Sarah Rae; Sarah Dash; Jacqui Webster; Rachael McLean; Sudhir Raj Thout; Norm R C Campbell; JoAnne Arcand
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.