Literature DB >> 28653274

Spatial updating of multiple targets: Comparison of younger and older adults.

Christopher R Bennett1,2, Jack M Loomis3, Roberta L Klatzky4, Nicholas A Giudice5,6.   

Abstract

When walking without vision, people mentally keep track of the directions and distances of previously viewed objects, a process called spatial updating. The current experiment indicates that while people across a large age range are able to update multiple targets in memory without perceptual support, aging negatively affects accuracy, precision, and decision time. Participants (20 to 80 years of age) viewed one, three, or six targets (colored lights) on the floor of a dimly lit room. Then, without vision, they walked to a target designated by color, either directly or indirectly (via a forward turning point). The younger adults' final stopping points were both accurate (near target) and precise (narrowly dispersed), but updating performance did degrade slightly with the number of targets. Older adults' performance was consistently worse than the younger group, but the lack of interaction between age and memory load indicates that the effect of age on performance was not further exacerbated by a greater number of targets. The number of targets also significantly increased the latency required to turn toward the designated target for both age groups. Taken together, results extend previous work showing impressive updating performance by younger adults, with novel findings showing that older adults manifest small but consistent degradation of updating performance of multitarget arrays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Spatial image; Spatial memory; Spatial updating; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653274      PMCID: PMC5711592          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0725-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  34 in total

1.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

2.  Preserved spatial memory over brief intervals in older adults.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; John X Zhang; Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson; Suzanne M Bloise; Julie A Higgins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-06

3.  Age differences in visual path integration.

Authors:  Omar Mahmood; Diane Adamo; Emily Briceno; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis; A C Beall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-05

5.  Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: effects of the number of objects.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang; James A Crowell; Daniel J Simons; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Michael S Ambinder; Laura E Thomas; Jessica L Gosney; Brian R Levinthal; Brendon B Hsieh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

6.  Spatial abilities and aging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl Techentin; Daniel Voyer; Susan D Voyer
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.645

7.  Map learning and the alignment effect in young and older adults: how do they gain from having a map available while performing pointing tasks?

Authors:  Erika Borella; Chiara Meneghetti; Veronica Muffato; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-09

8.  Effects of age on navigation strategy.

Authors:  M Kirk Rodgers; Joseph A Sindone; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  SPATIAL UPDATING OF HAPTIC ARRAYS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Christopher R Bennett; Roberta L Klatzky; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

10.  Age and dementia related differences in spatial navigation within an immersive virtual environment.

Authors:  Konstantine K Zakzanis; Genevieve Quintin; Simon J Graham; Richard Mraz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2009-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  No single, stable 3D representation can explain pointing biases in a spatial updating task.

Authors:  Jenny Vuong; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Visual and Auditory Spatial Localization in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Douglas A Addleman; Nam Anh Nguyen; Peggy B Nelson; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.702

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.