Literature DB >> 28358297

SPATIAL UPDATING OF HAPTIC ARRAYS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN.

Nicholas A Giudice1, Christopher R Bennett1, Roberta L Klatzky2, Jack M Loomis3.   

Abstract

Background/Study
Context: Aging research addressing spatial learning, representation, and action is almost exclusively based on vision as the input source. Much less is known about how spatial abilities from nonvisual inputs, particularly from haptic information, may change during life-span spatial development. This research studied whether learning and updating of haptic target configurations differs as a function of age.
METHODS: Three groups of participants, ranging from 20 to 80 years old, felt four-target table-top circular arrays and then performed several tasks to assess life-span haptic spatial cognition. Measures evaluated included egocentric pointing, allocentric pointing, and array reconstruction after physical or imagined spatial updating.
RESULTS: All measures revealed reliable differences between the oldest and youngest participant groups. The age effect for egocentric pointing contrasts with previous findings showing preserved egocentric spatial abilities. Error performance on allocentric pointing and map reconstruction tasks showing a clear age effect, with the oldest participants exhibiting the greatest error, is in line with other studies in the visual domain. Postupdating performance sharply declined with age but did not reliably differ between physical and imagined updating.
CONCLUSION: Results suggest that there is a general trend for age-related degradation of spatial abilities after haptic learning, with the greatest declines manifesting in all measures in people over 60 years of age. Results are interpreted in terms of a spatial aging effect on mental transformations of three-dimensional representations of space in working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28358297     DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2017.1298958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  2 in total

1.  Spatial updating of multiple targets: Comparison of younger and older adults.

Authors:  Christopher R Bennett; Jack M Loomis; Roberta L Klatzky; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

2.  Balance in Blind Subjects: Cane and Fingertip Touch Induce Similar Extent and Promptness of Stance Stabilization.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Francesco Decortes; Monica Schmid; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.