Literature DB >> 28652160

Establishment of a Web-based System for Collection of Patient-reported Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Steven M Lucas1, Tae-Kyung Kim2, Khurshid R Ghani2, David C Miller2, Susan Linsell2, Jay Starr3, James O Peabody4, Patrick Hurley5, James Montie2, Michael L Cher6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on the establishment of a unified, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) infrastructure and pilot results from the first 5 practices enrolled in the web-based collection system developed by the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those undergoing radical prostatectomy of 5 academic and community practices. PRO was obtained using a validated 21-item web-based questionnaire, regarding urinary function, erection function, and sexual interest and satisfaction. Data were collected preoperatively, at 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Patients were provided a link via email to complete the surveys. Perioperative and PRO data were analyzed as reports for individual patients and summary performance reports for individual surgeons.
RESULTS: Among 773 eligible patients, 688 (89%) were enrolled preoperatively. Survey completion rate was 88%, 84%, and 90% preoperatively, at 3 months, and 6 months. Electronic completion rates preoperatively, at 3 months, and 6 months were 70%, 70%, and 68%, respectively. Mean urinary function scores were 18.3, 14.3, and 16.6 (good function ≥ 17), whereas mean erection scores were 18.7, 7.3, and 9.1 (good erection score ≥ 22) before surgery, at 3 months, and 6 months. Variation was noted for erectile function among the practices.
CONCLUSION: Collection of electronic PRO via this unified, web-based format was successful and provided results that reflect expected recovery and identify opportunities for improvement. This will be extended to more practices statewide to improve outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28652160     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Development and Validation of Crosswalks for Patient-reported Sexual and Urinary Outcomes Between Commonly Used Instruments.

Authors:  Karandeep Singh; Amy L Tin; Rodney L Dunn; Tae Kim; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Development and Validation of Dynamic Multivariate Prediction Models of Sexual Function Recovery in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the MUSIC Statewide Collaborative.

Authors:  Nnenaya Agochukwu-Mmonu; Adharsh Murali; Daniela Wittmann; Brian Denton; Rodney L Dunn; James Montie; James Peabody; David Miller; Karandeep Singh
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Christine Dymek; Bryan Kim; Brigid Russell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Youmin Cho; Yun Jiang; Huiting Zhang; Marcelline Ruth Harris; Yang Gong; Ellen Lavoie Smith
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-Specific Variations in Patient-Reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy From a Statewide Improvement Collaborative.

Authors:  Gregory B Auffenberg; Ji Qi; Rodney L Dunn; Susan Linsell; Tae Kim; David C Miller; Jeffrey Tosoian; Richard Sarle; William K Johnston; Eduardo Kleer; Khurshid R Ghani; James Montie; James Peabody
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 6.  Treating the patient and not just the cancer: therapeutic burden in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Neal Shore; Oliver Sartor; Dana Rathkopf; Kara Olivier
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Patient Preferences and Treatment Decisions for Prostate Cancer: Results From A Statewide Urological Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Authors:  Roshan Paudel; Stephanie Ferrante; Ji Qi; Rodney L Dunn; Donna L Berry; Alice Semerjian; Christopher M Brede; Arvin K George; Brian R Lane; Kevin B Ginsburg; James E Montie; Giulia I Lane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Determinants of self-reported functional status (EPIC-26) in prostate cancer patients prior to treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Roth; Sebastian Dieng; Alisa Oesterle; Günter Feick; Günther Carl; Andreas Hinkel; Thomas Steiner; Björn Theodor Kaftan; Frank Kunath; Boris Hadaschik; Simba-Joshua Oostdam; Rein Jüri Palisaar; Mateusz Koralewski; Burkhard Beyer; Björn Haben; Igor Tsaur; Simone Wesselmann; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.