Chun-Ju Hsiao1, Christine Dymek2, Bryan Kim2, Brigid Russell3. 1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD, 20857, USA. janey.hsiao@ahrq.hhs.gov. 2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD, 20857, USA. 3. The Joint Commission, 701 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20004, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The effective use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can play a critical role in improving health care delivery and patient experience with care. However, PROs are not widely collected and used in clinical practice. This study aims to understand current opportunities and challenges with the use of PROs and the potential for health information technology (IT) to advance their use. METHODS: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality held two technical expert panel (TEP) meetings to discuss the current use of PROs, challenges, and opportunities in implementation, and how health IT can be leveraged to support effective PRO use in clinical practice. Results were synthesized to identify major themes and takeaways based on different stages of PRO data utilization. RESULTS: Findings from the TEP meetings indicated varying degrees of PRO usage in ambulatory care settings. Practices often lack a business case to collect PROs. Primary care physicians face more challenges than specialists in selecting appropriate PRO measures due to extensive variation in their patient populations. Providers also need training to use PRO data for shared decision making and population health management. Potential research areas to address PRO implementation challenges include measures harmonization, implementation process and workflow, electronic data collection and integration, and user-friendly data displays. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist during different stages of PRO implementation to advance the use of PROs in clinical practice. Health IT can be utilized to address challenges in data collection, integration, and visualization to make PRO data accessible and understandable to patients and providers.
PURPOSE: The effective use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can play a critical role in improving health care delivery and patient experience with care. However, PROs are not widely collected and used in clinical practice. This study aims to understand current opportunities and challenges with the use of PROs and the potential for health information technology (IT) to advance their use. METHODS: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality held two technical expert panel (TEP) meetings to discuss the current use of PROs, challenges, and opportunities in implementation, and how health IT can be leveraged to support effective PRO use in clinical practice. Results were synthesized to identify major themes and takeaways based on different stages of PRO data utilization. RESULTS: Findings from the TEP meetings indicated varying degrees of PRO usage in ambulatory care settings. Practices often lack a business case to collect PROs. Primary care physicians face more challenges than specialists in selecting appropriate PRO measures due to extensive variation in their patient populations. Providers also need training to use PRO data for shared decision making and population health management. Potential research areas to address PRO implementation challenges include measures harmonization, implementation process and workflow, electronic data collection and integration, and user-friendly data displays. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist during different stages of PRO implementation to advance the use of PROs in clinical practice. Health IT can be utilized to address challenges in data collection, integration, and visualization to make PRO data accessible and understandable to patients and providers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ambulatory care; Health information technology; Patient-reported outcomes; Primary care
Authors: Amy P Abernethy; Asif Ahmad; S Yousuf Zafar; Jane L Wheeler; Jennifer Barsky Reese; H Kim Lyerly Journal: Med Care Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Robert J Valuck; Heather O Anderson; Anne M Libby; Elias Brandt; Cathy Bryan; Richard R Allen; Elizabeth W Staton; David R West; Wilson D Pace Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Elizabeth Austin; Cynthia LeRouge; Andrea L Hartzler; Courtney Segal; Danielle C Lavallee Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Elizabeth Austin; Cynthia LeRouge; Andrea L Hartzler; Arlene E Chung; Courtney Segal; Danielle C Lavallee Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2019-08-20
Authors: Therese A Nelson; Brigitte Anderson; Jiang Bian; Andrew D Boyd; Shirley V Burton; Kristina Davis; Yi Guo; Bhrandon A Harris; Kelly Hynes; Karl M Kochendorfer; David Liebovitz; Kayla Martin; François Modave; John Moses; Nicholas D Soulakis; Donald Weinbrenner; Sonya H White; Nan E Rothrock; Annette L Valenta; Justin B Starren Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2020-04-06
Authors: Jens Lehmann; Maria Rothmund; David Riedl; Gerhard Rumpold; Vincent Grote; Michael J Fischer; Bernhard Holzner Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Angela M Stover; Lotte Haverman; Hedy A van Oers; Joanne Greenhalgh; Caroline M Potter Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 4.147