Literature DB >> 28649874

A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.

Nolan A Wages1, Nikole Varhegyi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In evaluating the performance of Phase I dose-finding designs, simulation studies are typically conducted to assess how often a method correctly selects the true maximum tolerated dose under a set of assumed dose-toxicity curves. A necessary component of the evaluation process is to have some concept for how well a design can possibly perform. The notion of an upper bound on the accuracy of maximum tolerated dose selection is often omitted from the simulation study, and the aim of this work is to provide researchers with accessible software to quickly evaluate the operating characteristics of Phase I methods using a benchmark.
METHODS: The non-parametric optimal benchmark is a useful theoretical tool for simulations that can serve as an upper limit for the accuracy of maximum tolerated dose identification based on a binary toxicity endpoint. It offers researchers a sense of the plausibility of a Phase I method's operating characteristics in simulation. We have developed an R shiny web application for simulating the benchmark.
RESULTS: The web application has the ability to quickly provide simulation results for the benchmark and requires no programming knowledge. The application is free to access and use on any device with an Internet browser.
CONCLUSION: The application provides the percentage of correct selection of the maximum tolerated dose and an accuracy index, operating characteristics typically used in evaluating the accuracy of dose-finding designs. We hope this software will facilitate the use of the non-parametric optimal benchmark as an evaluation tool in dose-finding simulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-finding; Phase I; benchmark; optimal design; shiny; software

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28649874      PMCID: PMC5630493          DOI: 10.1177/1740774517715456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  5 in total

1.  Non-parametric optimal design in dose finding studies.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Xavier Paoletti; Jean Maccario
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Scientific Review of Phase I Protocols With Novel Dose-Escalation Designs: How Much Information Is Needed?

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Mithat Gönen; George J Bosl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Implementation of adaptive methods in early-phase clinical trials.

Authors:  Gina R Petroni; Nolan A Wages; Gautier Paux; Frédéric Dubois
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.486

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Logistic retainment interval dose exploration design for Phase I clinical trials of cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 1.234

2.  A benchmark for dose-finding studies with unknown ordering.

Authors:  Pavel Mozgunov; Xavier Paoletti; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  A web tool for designing and conducting phase I trials using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Designing and evaluating dose-escalation studies made easy: The MoDEsT web app.

Authors:  Philip Pallmann; Fang Wan; Adrian P Mander; Graham M Wheeler; Christina Yap; Sally Clive; Lisa V Hampson; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  CFO: Calibration-free odds design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Huaqing Jin; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.494

6.  Practical recommendations for implementing a Bayesian adaptive phase I design during a pandemic.

Authors:  Sean Ewings; Geoff Saunders; Thomas Jaki; Pavel Mozgunov
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.