Literature DB >> 28648823

The Evolution of Venom by Co-option of Single-Copy Genes.

Ellen O Martinson1, Yogeshwar D Kelkar1, Ching-Ho Chang1, John H Werren2.   

Abstract

The classic model for the evolution of novel gene function is through gene duplication followed by evolution of a new function by one of the copies (neofunctionalization) [1, 2]. However, other modes have also been found, such as novel genes arising from non-coding DNA, chimeric fusions, and lateral gene transfers from other organisms [3-7]. Here we use the rapid turnover of venom genes in parasitoid wasps to study how new gene functions evolve. In contrast to the classic gene duplication model, we find that a common mode of acquisition of new venom genes in parasitoid wasps is co-option of single-copy genes from non-venom progenitors. Transcriptome and proteome sequencing reveal that recruitment and loss of venom genes occur primarily by rapid cis-regulatory expression evolution in the venom gland. Loss of venom genes is primarily due to downregulation of expression in the gland rather than gene death through coding sequence degradation. While the majority of venom genes have specialized expression in the venom gland, recent losses of venom function occur primarily among genes that show broader expression in development, suggesting that they can more readily switch functional roles. We propose that co-option of single-copy genes may be a common but relatively understudied mechanism of evolution for new gene functions, particularly under conditions of rapid evolutionary change.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cis-regulation; evolution; neofunctionalization; novelty; parasitoid; proteome; transcriptome; venom; wasp

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648823      PMCID: PMC5719492          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  67 in total

Review 1.  Venom evolution through gene duplications.

Authors:  Emily S W Wong; Katherine Belov
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms.

Authors:  Nicholas R Casewell; Wolfgang Wüster; Freek J Vonk; Robert A Harrison; Bryan G Fry
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Novel genes derived from noncoding DNA in Drosophila melanogaster are frequently X-linked and exhibit testis-biased expression.

Authors:  Mia T Levine; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Heather A Lindfors; David J Begun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The ectoparasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) differentially affects cells mediating the immune response of its flesh fly host, Sarcophaga bullata Parker (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).

Authors:  D B. Rivers; L Ruggiero; M Hayes
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.354

8.  Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Function and evolution of DNA methylation in Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Xu Wang; David Wheeler; Amanda Avery; Alfredo Rago; Jeong-Hyeon Choi; John K Colbourne; Andrew G Clark; John H Werren
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Spider genomes provide insight into composition and evolution of venom and silk.

Authors:  Kristian W Sanggaard; Jesper S Bechsgaard; Xiaodong Fang; Jinjie Duan; Thomas F Dyrlund; Vikas Gupta; Xuanting Jiang; Ling Cheng; Dingding Fan; Yue Feng; Lijuan Han; Zhiyong Huang; Zongze Wu; Li Liao; Virginia Settepani; Ida B Thøgersen; Bram Vanthournout; Tobias Wang; Yabing Zhu; Peter Funch; Jan J Enghild; Leif Schauser; Stig U Andersen; Palle Villesen; Mikkel H Schierup; Trine Bilde; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  35 in total

1.  Venom is beneficial but not essential for development and survival of Nasonia.

Authors:  Ellen O Martinson; John H Werren
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.465

2.  Giant fish-killing water bug reveals ancient and dynamic venom evolution in Heteroptera.

Authors:  Andrew A Walker; Maria José Hernández-Vargas; Gerardo Corzo; Bryan G Fry; Glenn F King
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Evaluating the evolution and function of the dynamic Venom Y protein in ectoparasitoid wasps.

Authors:  E O Martinson; A L Siebert; M He; Y D Kelkar; L A Doucette; J H Werren
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.585

4.  Polymorphism and Divergence of Novel Gene Expression Patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julie M Cridland; Alex C Majane; Hayley K Sheehy; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genomes of the Hymenoptera.

Authors:  Michael G Branstetter; Anna K Childers; Diana Cox-Foster; Keith R Hopper; Karen M Kapheim; Amy L Toth; Kim C Worley
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.186

6.  Production, composition, and mode of action of the painful defensive venom produced by a limacodid caterpillar, Doratifera vulnerans.

Authors:  Andrew A Walker; Samuel D Robinson; Jean-Paul V Paluzzi; David J Merritt; Samantha A Nixon; Christina I Schroeder; Jiayi Jin; Mohaddeseh Hedayati Goudarzi; Andrew C Kotze; Zoltan Dekan; Andy Sombke; Paul F Alewood; Bryan G Fry; Marc E Epstein; Irina Vetter; Glenn F King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tracking the recruitment and evolution of snake toxins using the evolutionary context provided by the Bothrops jararaca genome.

Authors:  Diego Dantas Almeida; Vincent Louis Viala; Pedro Gabriel Nachtigall; Michael Broe; H Lisle Gibbs; Solange Maria de Toledo Serrano; Ana Maria Moura-da-Silva; Paulo Lee Ho; Milton Yutaka Nishiyama-Jr; Inácio L M Junqueira-de-Azevedo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A Dipteran's Novel Sucker Punch: Evolution of Arthropod Atypical Venom with a Neurotoxic Component in Robber Flies (Asilidae, Diptera).

Authors:  Stephan Holger Drukewitz; Nico Fuhrmann; Eivind A B Undheim; Alexander Blanke; Julien Giribaldi; Rosanna Mary; Guillaume Laconde; Sébastien Dutertre; Björn Marcus von Reumont
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Are Fireworms Venomous? Evidence for the Convergent Evolution of Toxin Homologs in Three Species of Fireworms (Annelida, Amphinomidae).

Authors:  Aida Verdes; Danny Simpson; Mandë Holford
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Genome of the pincer wasp Gonatopus flavifemur reveals unique venom evolution and a dual adaptation to parasitism and predation.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Xinhai Ye; Cong Dang; Yunshen Cao; Rui Hong; Yu H Sun; Shan Xiao; Yang Mei; Le Xu; Qi Fang; Huamei Xiao; Fei Li; Gongyin Ye
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.