Literature DB >> 28646369

Impacts of a Temporary Urban Pop-Up Park on Physical Activity and Other Individual- and Community-Level Outcomes.

Deborah Salvo1,2, Jorge A Banda3, Jylana L Sheats4, Sandra J Winter3, Daniela Lopes Dos Santos5, Abby C King3,6.   

Abstract

Physical inactivity is a known risk factor for obesity and a number of chronic diseases. Modifying the physical features of neighborhoods to provide residents with equitable and convenient access to spaces for physical activity (PA) is a promising strategy for promoting PA. Public urban recreation spaces (e.g., parks) play an important role in promoting PA and are potentially an important neighborhood element for optimizing social capital and liveability in cities. Most studies examining the effects of park availability and use on PA have focused on traditional, permanent parks. The aims of this study were to (1) document patterns of park use and park-based PA at a temporary urban pop-up park implemented in the downtown business district of Los Altos, California during July-August 2013 and May-June 2014, (2) identify factors associated with park-based PA in 2014, and (3) examine the effects of the 2014 pop-up park on additional outcomes of potential benefit for park users and the Los Altos community at large. Park use remained high during most hours of the day in 2013 and 2014. Although the park attracted a multigenerational group of users, children and adolescents were most likely to engage in walking or more vigorous PA at the park. Park presence was significantly associated with potentially beneficial changes in time-allocation patterns among users, including a reduction in screen-time and an increase in overall park-time and time spent outdoors. Park implementation resulted in notable use among people who would otherwise not be spending time at a park (85% of surveyed users would not be spending time at any other park if the pop-up park was not there-2014 data analysis). Our results (significantly higher odds of spending time in downtown Los Altos due to park presence) suggest that urban pop-up parks may also have broader community benefits, such as attracting people to visit downtown business districts. Pending larger, confirmatory studies, our results suggest that temporary urban pop-up parks may contribute to solving the limited access to public physical activity recreation spaces many urban residents face.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Built environment; Parks and public spaces; Physical activity; Pop-up parks; SOPARC

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646369      PMCID: PMC5533666          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-017-0167-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  33 in total

1.  System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures.

Authors:  Thomas L McKenzie; Deborah A Cohen; Amber Sehgal; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2006-02

2.  Top 10 research questions related to assessing physical activity and its contexts using systematic observation.

Authors:  Thomas L McKenzie; Hans van der Mars
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Ding Ding; Kenny D Lawson; Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander; Eric A Finkelstein; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Willem van Mechelen; Michael Pratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Assessing the effect of physical activity classes in public spaces on leisure-time physical activity: "Al Ritmo de las Comunidades" A natural experiment in Bogota, Colombia.

Authors:  Andrea Torres; María Paula Díaz; Matthew J Hayat; Rodney Lyn; Michael Pratt; Deborah Salvo; Olga L Sarmiento
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Bing Han; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Daniella Golinelli; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

6.  The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Catherine J Nagel; Peter Harnik; Thomas L McKenzie; Kelly R Evenson; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Christine Vaughan; Sweatha Katta
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Reis; Deborah Salvo; David Ogilvie; Estelle V Lambert; Shifalika Goenka; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children's physical activity?

Authors:  Kate Lachowycz; Andy P Jones; Angie S Page; Benedict W Wheeler; Ashley R Cooper
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.078

10.  Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis.

Authors:  Steven C Moore; Alpa V Patel; Charles E Matthews; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Yikyung Park; Hormuzd A Katki; Martha S Linet; Elisabete Weiderpass; Kala Visvanathan; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Michael Thun; Susan M Gapstur; Patricia Hartge; I-Min Lee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Andrea Jelić; Nancy M Wells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits.

Authors:  Sandra J Winter; Jylana L Sheats; Deborah Salvo; Jorge A Banda; Jennifer Quinn; Brooke Ray Rivera; Abby C King
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 3.  Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathryn P Derose; Deshira D Wallace; Bing Han; Deborah A Cohen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.637

4.  Health by Design: Interweaving Health Promotion into Environments and Settings.

Authors:  Andrew E Springer; Alexandra E Evans; Jaquelin Ortuño; Deborah Salvo; Maria Teresa Varela Arévalo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 5.  Translating Urban Walkability Initiatives for Older Adults in Rural and Under-Resourced Communities.

Authors:  Alexandra Klann; Linh Vu; Mollie Ewing; Mark Fenton; Rachele Pojednic
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Perceptions of Nature and Access to Green Space in Four Urban Neighborhoods.

Authors:  Justine S Sefcik; Michelle C Kondo; Heather Klusaritz; Elisa Sarantschin; Sara Solomon; Abbey Roepke; Eugenia C South; Sara F Jacoby
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Use of SOPARC to assess physical activity in parks: do race/ethnicity, contextual conditions, and settings of the target area, affect reliability?

Authors:  Oriol Marquet; J Aaron Hipp; Claudia Alberico; Jing-Huei Huang; Dustin Fry; Elizabeth Mazak; Gina S Lovasi; Myron F Floyd
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.