Literature DB >> 32613496

A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits.

Sandra J Winter1, Jylana L Sheats2,3, Deborah Salvo2,4, Jorge A Banda2,5, Jennifer Quinn6, Brooke Ray Rivera7, Abby C King2,8.   

Abstract

The availability of parks and urban green spaces has been associated with a number of benefits, including increased physical activity, improvements in mental health, increases in social interactions, improvements to the environment, and increases in property values. The installation of temporary pop-up parks in urban areas is one way for urban communities to obtain these benefits. In this mixed-methods study, quantitative and qualitative data were gathered by researchers, the city council, a local investment company, and community residents that informed the initiation, iteration, and incremental expansion of a series of temporary, summer pop-up parks in the downtown business district of the City of Los Altos in Northern California over a 4-year period (2013-2016). Results showed that the parks were visited by a large, multigenerational group of users who engaged in leisure-time physical activity, shopped at local stores, attended programed events, and socialized with others. Direct observation and survey data gathered in year 2014 also indicated that foot traffic into businesses directly fronting on a pop-up park (n = 8) was higher during a 4-day period when the park was in place, as compared to a similar 4-day period before the park was installed. The majority of downtown business owners/managers reported no decrease in sales compared to the month before the pop-up park was installed. City sales tax data indicated increases in year-on-year sales tax revenue in the summer quarter of 2014 and 2016 compared with the year (2015) when there was no downtown pop-up park. Perspectives of community residents collected before, during, and after the installation of the pop-up parks indicated that the pop-up park created a vibrant space in an otherwise underutilized area that was enjoyed by a variety of people in a host of ways (e.g., children playing, families relaxing, people shopping and eating at downtown stores and restaurants, people of all ages attending scheduled park events). These results informed a number of discussions and meetings between key stakeholders about the pop-up parks, culminating in a temporary park that was held in a new location in 2017 that was substantially larger in size, installed for a longer time period, cost more, and had more scheduled park events. Results from this prospective investigation of the initial impacts of pop-up parks in this urban location provide insights regarding the potential benefits and viability of such temporary parks for residents and businesses alike.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Citizen science; Economic development; Mixed-methods study; Physical activity; Pop-up parks; Public-private partnerships

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613496      PMCID: PMC7392974          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-020-00434-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  23 in total

1.  Park-Use Behavior and Perceptions by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Immigrant Status in Minneapolis, MN: Implications on Park Strategies for Addressing Health Disparities.

Authors:  Kirti V Das; Yingling Fan; Simone A French
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-04

2.  Contribution of public parks to physical activity.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Thomas L McKenzie; Amber Sehgal; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli; Nicole Lurie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  From broken windows to busy streets: a community empowerment perspective.

Authors:  Sophie M Aiyer; Marc A Zimmerman; Susan Morrel-Samuels; Thomas M Reischl
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-12-15

4.  Short-term associations between objective crime, park-use, and park-based physical activity in low-income neighborhoods.

Authors:  Oriol Marquet; J Aaron Hipp; Claudia Alberico; Jing-Huei Huang; Dustin Fry; Elizabeth Mazak; Gina S Lovasi; Myron F Floyd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Beyond proximity: the importance of green space useability to self-reported health.

Authors:  May Carter; Pierre Horwitz
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.184

6.  How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Claude Setodji; Kelly R Evenson; Phillip Ward; Sandra Lapham; Amy Hillier; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-11

7.  System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures.

Authors:  Thomas L McKenzie; Deborah A Cohen; Amber Sehgal; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2006-02

8.  The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Bing Han; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Daniella Golinelli; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

Review 9.  The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: a systematic review and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Ruth F Hunter; Hayley Christian; Jenny Veitch; Thomas Astell-Burt; J Aaron Hipp; Jasper Schipperijn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning.

Authors:  Andrew Chee Keng Lee; Hannah C Jordan; Jason Horsley
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Community-Based Approaches to Reducing Health Inequities and Fostering Environmental Justice through Global Youth-Engaged Citizen Science.

Authors:  Abby C King; Feyisayo A Odunitan-Wayas; Moushumi Chaudhury; Maria Alejandra Rubio; Michael Baiocchi; Tracy Kolbe-Alexander; Felipe Montes; Ann Banchoff; Olga Lucia Sarmiento; Katarina Bälter; Erica Hinckson; Sebastien Chastin; Estelle V Lambert; Silvia A González; Ana María Guerra; Peter Gelius; Caroline Zha; Chethan Sarabu; Pooja A Kakar; Praveena Fernes; Lisa G Rosas; Sandra J Winter; Elizabeth McClain; Paul A Gardiner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Health Equity.

Authors:  Lisa G Rosas; Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa; Felipe Montes Jimenez; Abby C King
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 21.870

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.