Deborah A Cohen1, Bing Han2, Catherine J Nagel3, Peter Harnik4, Thomas L McKenzie5, Kelly R Evenson6, Terry Marsh2, Stephanie Williamson2, Christine Vaughan2, Sweatha Katta3. 1. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. Electronic address: dcohen@rand.org. 2. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. 3. City Parks Alliance, Washington, District of Columbia. 4. Trust for Public Land, Washington, District of Columbia. 5. School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: An extensive infrastructure of neighborhood parks supports leisure time physical activity in most U.S. cities; yet, most Americans do not meet national guidelines for physical activity. Neighborhood parks have never been assessed nationally to identify their role in physical activity. METHODS: Using a stratified multistage sampling strategy, a representative sample of 174 neighborhood parks in 25 major cities (population >100,000) across the U.S. was selected. Park use, park-based physical activity, and park conditions were observed during a typical week using systematic direct observation during spring/summer of 2014. Park administrators were interviewed to assess policies and practices. Data were analyzed in 2014-2015 using repeated-measure negative binomial regressions to estimate weekly park use and park-based physical activity. RESULTS: Nationwide, the average neighborhood park of 8.8 acres averaged 20 users/hour or an estimated 1,533 person hours of weekly use. Walking loops and gymnasia each generated 221 hours/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Seniors represented 4% of park users, but 20% of the general population. Parks were used less in low-income than in high-income neighborhoods, largely explained by fewer supervised activities and marketing/outreach efforts. Programming and marketing were associated with 37% and 63% more hours of moderate to vigorous physical activity/week in parks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings establish national benchmarks for park use, which can guide future park investments and management practices to improve population health. Offering more programming, using marketing tools like banners and posters, and installing facilities like walking loops, may help currently underutilized parks increase population physical activity.
INTRODUCTION: An extensive infrastructure of neighborhood parks supports leisure time physical activity in most U.S. cities; yet, most Americans do not meet national guidelines for physical activity. Neighborhood parks have never been assessed nationally to identify their role in physical activity. METHODS: Using a stratified multistage sampling strategy, a representative sample of 174 neighborhood parks in 25 major cities (population >100,000) across the U.S. was selected. Park use, park-based physical activity, and park conditions were observed during a typical week using systematic direct observation during spring/summer of 2014. Park administrators were interviewed to assess policies and practices. Data were analyzed in 2014-2015 using repeated-measure negative binomial regressions to estimate weekly park use and park-based physical activity. RESULTS: Nationwide, the average neighborhood park of 8.8 acres averaged 20 users/hour or an estimated 1,533 person hours of weekly use. Walking loops and gymnasia each generated 221 hours/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Seniors represented 4% of park users, but 20% of the general population. Parks were used less in low-income than in high-income neighborhoods, largely explained by fewer supervised activities and marketing/outreach efforts. Programming and marketing were associated with 37% and 63% more hours of moderate to vigorous physical activity/week in parks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings establish national benchmarks for park use, which can guide future park investments and management practices to improve population health. Offering more programming, using marketing tools like banners and posters, and installing facilities like walking loops, may help currently underutilized parks increase population physical activity.
Authors: Billie Giles-Corti; Melissa H Broomhall; Matthew Knuiman; Catherine Collins; Kate Douglas; Kevin Ng; Andrea Lange; Robert J Donovan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Jennifer Isacoff; Bianca Shulaker; Stephanie Williamson; Terry Marsh; Thomas L McKenzie; Megan Weir; Rajiv Bhatia Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli; Thomas L McKenzie Journal: Health Place Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Bing Han; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Daniella Golinelli; Thomas L McKenzie Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2014 Jan-Feb
Authors: Bing Han; Deborah A Cohen; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Laura Raaen Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lilah M Besser; Jana Hirsch; James E Galvin; John Renne; Juyoung Park; Kelly R Evenson; Joel D Kaufman; Annette L Fitzpatrick Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Sandy J Slater; Elizabeth Tarlov; Kelly Jones; Stephen A Matthews; Coady Wing; Shannon N Zenk Journal: Health Place Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Elizabeth L Oliphant; S Morgan Hughey; Ellen W Stowe; Andrew T Kaczynski; Jasper Schipperijn; J Aaron Hipp Journal: J Park Recreat Admi Date: 2019-02-08
Authors: Andrea S Richardson; Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar; Rebecca L Collins; Gerald P Hunter; Wendy M Troxel; Natalie Colabianchi; Deborah A Cohen; Tamara Dubowitz Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.671