Literature DB >> 27209496

The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity.

Deborah A Cohen1, Bing Han2, Catherine J Nagel3, Peter Harnik4, Thomas L McKenzie5, Kelly R Evenson6, Terry Marsh2, Stephanie Williamson2, Christine Vaughan2, Sweatha Katta3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An extensive infrastructure of neighborhood parks supports leisure time physical activity in most U.S. cities; yet, most Americans do not meet national guidelines for physical activity. Neighborhood parks have never been assessed nationally to identify their role in physical activity.
METHODS: Using a stratified multistage sampling strategy, a representative sample of 174 neighborhood parks in 25 major cities (population >100,000) across the U.S. was selected. Park use, park-based physical activity, and park conditions were observed during a typical week using systematic direct observation during spring/summer of 2014. Park administrators were interviewed to assess policies and practices. Data were analyzed in 2014-2015 using repeated-measure negative binomial regressions to estimate weekly park use and park-based physical activity.
RESULTS: Nationwide, the average neighborhood park of 8.8 acres averaged 20 users/hour or an estimated 1,533 person hours of weekly use. Walking loops and gymnasia each generated 221 hours/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Seniors represented 4% of park users, but 20% of the general population. Parks were used less in low-income than in high-income neighborhoods, largely explained by fewer supervised activities and marketing/outreach efforts. Programming and marketing were associated with 37% and 63% more hours of moderate to vigorous physical activity/week in parks, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings establish national benchmarks for park use, which can guide future park investments and management practices to improve population health. Offering more programming, using marketing tools like banners and posters, and installing facilities like walking loops, may help currently underutilized parks increase population physical activity.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209496      PMCID: PMC5030121          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  22 in total

1.  System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures.

Authors:  Thomas L McKenzie; Deborah A Cohen; Amber Sehgal; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2006-02

Review 2.  Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; Melissa H Broomhall; Matthew Knuiman; Catherine Collins; Kate Douglas; Kevin Ng; Andrea Lange; Robert J Donovan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Impact of park renovations on park use and park-based physical activity.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Jennifer Isacoff; Bianca Shulaker; Stephanie Williamson; Terry Marsh; Thomas L McKenzie; Megan Weir; Rajiv Bhatia
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-06-20

4.  Impact and cost-effectiveness of family Fitness Zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Daniela Golinelli; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Validation of a New Counter for Direct Observation of Physical Activity in Parks.

Authors:  Bing Han; Deborah A Cohen; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Terence Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Laura Raaen
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Bing Han; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Daniella Golinelli; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

7.  Quantifying the contribution of neighborhood parks to physical activity.

Authors:  Bing Han; Deborah Cohen; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Physical activity: does environment make a difference for tension, stress, emotional outlook, and perceptions of health status?

Authors:  Robin Puett; Jane Teas; Vanesa España-Romero; Enrique Garcia Artero; Duck-chul Lee; Meghan Baruth; Xuemei Sui; Jessica Montresor-López; Steven N Blair
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-04-11

9.  How much neighborhood parks contribute to local residents' physical activity in the City of Los Angeles: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bing Han; Deborah A Cohen; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Laura Raaen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  39 in total

1.  Associations between neighborhood park space and cognition in older adults vary by US location: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Lilah M Besser; Jana Hirsch; James E Galvin; John Renne; Juyoung Park; Kelly R Evenson; Joel D Kaufman; Annette L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Contributions of Neighborhood Parks to Physical Activity in High-Poverty Urban Neighborhoods.

Authors:  Sujeong Park; Bing Han; Deborah A Cohen; Kathryn P Derose
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  How Do Racial/Ethnic Groups Differ in Their Use of Neighborhood Parks? Findings from the National Study of Neighborhood Parks.

Authors:  Christine A Vaughan; Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Stephanie Williamson; Bing Han; Thomas L McKenzie; Deborah A Cohen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Park Use in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods: Who Uses the Parks and Why?

Authors:  Christine A Vaughan; Natalie Colabianchi; Gerald P Hunter; Robin Beckman; Tamara Dubowitz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Would increasing access to recreational places promote healthier weights and a healthier nation?

Authors:  Sandy J Slater; Elizabeth Tarlov; Kelly Jones; Stephen A Matthews; Coady Wing; Shannon N Zenk
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  ParkIndex: Using Key Informant Interviews to Inform the Development of a New Park Access Evaluation Tool.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Oliphant; S Morgan Hughey; Ellen W Stowe; Andrew T Kaczynski; Jasper Schipperijn; J Aaron Hipp
Journal:  J Park Recreat Admi       Date:  2019-02-08

8.  Improved Street Walkability, Incivilities, and Esthetics Are Associated with Greater Park Use in Two Low-Income Neighborhoods.

Authors:  Andrea S Richardson; Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar; Rebecca L Collins; Gerald P Hunter; Wendy M Troxel; Natalie Colabianchi; Deborah A Cohen; Tamara Dubowitz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  The association between park facilities and the occurrence of physical activity during park visits.

Authors:  Orion Theodore Stewart; Anne Vernez Moudon; Alyson Littman; Edmund Seto; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  J Leis Res       Date:  2019-01-09

10.  Association of neighborhood parks with child health in the United States.

Authors:  Aaron Reuben; George W Rutherford; Jameze James; Nooshin Razani
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.