| Literature DB >> 28645650 |
Jun-Feng Shi1, Chang-Qing Sun2.
Abstract
Tomato is one of the most important vegetables in the world. Decay after harvest is a major issue in the development of tomato industry. Currently, the most effective method for controlling decay after harvest is storage of tomato at low temperature combined with usage of chemical bactericide; however, long-term usage of chemical bactericide not only causes pathogen resistance but also is harmful for human health and environment. Biocontrol method for the management of disease after tomato harvest has great practical significance. In this study, antagonistic bacterium B-6-1 strain was isolated from the surface of tomato and identified as Enterobacter cowanii based on morphological characteristics and physiological and biochemical features combined with sequence analysis of 16SrDNA and ropB gene and construction of dendrogram. Effects of different concentrations of antagonistic bacterium E. cowanii suspension on antifungal activity after tomato harvest were analyzed by mycelium growth rate method. Results revealed that antifungal activity was also enhanced with increasing concentrations of antagonistic bacterium; inhibitory rates of 1×105 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL antagonistic bacterial solution on Fusarium verticillioides, Alternaria tenuissima, and Botrytis cinerea were 46.31%, 67.48%, and 75.67%, respectively. By using in vivo inoculation method, it was further confirmed that antagonistic bacterium could effectively inhibit the occurrence of B. cinerae after tomato harvest, biocontrol effect of 1×109cfu/mL zymotic fluid reached up to 95.24%, and antagonistic bacterium E. cowanii has biocontrol potential against B. cinerea after harvest of fruits and vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: Antagonistic bacterium; Antifungal activity; Identification; Tomato
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28645650 PMCID: PMC5628304 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.03.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Incidence rate and the diameter of lesion after inoculation of the wounds of tomatoes with antagonistic bacteria and yeast against B. cinerea.
| Strains | Incidence rate (%) | Diameter of lesions (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 4.27 ± 0.15a |
| B-1 | 0.00 ± 0.00f | 0.00 ± 0.00f |
| B-6-1 | 0.00 ± 0.00f | 0.00 ± 0.00f |
| B-12 | 4.67 ± 1.76f | 0.90 ± 0.20ef |
| B-13 | 41.33 ± 7.08cd | 2.50 ± 0.29 cd |
| B-15 | 71.04 ± 4.33b | 3.43 ± 0.23abc |
| B-20 | 28.67 ± 3.47de | 1.78 ± 0.12de |
| Y-7 | 75.34 ± 2.91b | 3.67 ± 0.24ab |
| Y-10 | 63.50 ± 2.88bc | 2.89 ± 0.43bc |
| Y-18 | 11.98 ± 3.61ef | 0.93 ± 0.18ef |
| Y-19 | 48.57 ± 3.17cd | 2.87 ± 0.07bc |
| Y-12 | 0.00 ± 0.00f | 0.00 ± 0.00f |
SD = standard deviation.
Data in the table are expressed as mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Duncan's new multiple range test (P < 0.05).
Fig. 1Inhibitory effect of antagonistic bacteria B-6-1 strain on B. cinerea.
Physiological and biochemical characteristics of B-6-1.
| Characteristics | Results | Characteristics | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalase | + | Oxidase | − |
| Methyl red reaction | − | Nitrate reduction | + |
| β-Galactosidase | + | Arginine double hydrolysis | − |
| Lysine decarboxylase | − | Ornithine decarboxylase | − |
| Citric acid use | + | H2S production | − |
| Urease | − | Tryptophan deaminase | + |
| Indole production | − | VP reaction | + |
| Gelatinase | − | Inositol | + |
| Melezitose | − | Glycerin | + |
| Mannitol | + | Raffinose | + |
| Erythritol | − | Sorbitol | + |
| − | Starch | − | |
| α-Methyl- | − | Glycogen | − |
| α-Methyl- | − | Xylitol | − |
| N-Acetyl-glucosamine | + | Gentiobiosyl | + |
| Amygdalin | + | − | |
| Arbutin | + | + | |
| Aesculin | + | − | |
| Salicin | + | + | |
| Cellobiose | + | − | |
| Maltose | + | − | |
| Lactose | − | − | |
| Melibiose | + | Gluconate | + |
| Sucrose | + | 2-Keto-gluconate | w |
| Trehalose | + | 5-Keto-gluconate | − |
| Inulin | − | β-Methyl- | − |
| + | + | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| Adon alcohol | − | + | |
| + | Dulcitol | + |
Physiological and biochemical characteristics index selected according to the 9th edition of Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology.
Fig. 2Dendrogram based on 16S rDNA sequences of strain B-6-1 constructed using neighbor-joining method.
Note: The number at the node means the percentage of occurrence in 1000 boot-strapped trees; the scale bar means 0.5% sequence difference; “T” in the upper right-hand corner indicates the type of strain.
Fig. 3Dendrogram based on ropB gene sequences of strain B-6-1 constructed by neighbor-joining method.
Note: The number at the node means the percentage of occurrence in 1000 boot-strapped trees; the scale bar means 0.5% sequence difference; “T” in the upper right-hand corner indicates the type strain.
Inhibitory effect of different concentrations of antagonistic bacteria on three fungal pathogens (P < 0.05).
| Concentration (cfu/mL) | Inhibition rate (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 × 105 | 46.31 ± 1.14b | 67.48 ± 1.39b | 75.67 ± 1.49b |
| 1 × 106 | 48.12 ± 2.13b | 68.29 ± 1.24b | 76.53 ± 1.63b |
| 1 × 107 | 48.72 ± 3.03b | 69.38 ± 1.99b | 78.00 ± 0.39b |
| 1 × 108 | 53.33 ± 1.03b | 74.53 ± 2.25ab | 80.12 ± 1.90b |
| 1 × 109 | 69.75 ± 2.08a | 78.32 ± 1.91a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
SD = standard deviation.
Data in the table are expressed as mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Duncan's new multiple range test (P < 0.05).
Results of confrontation culture of antagonistic bacteria E. cowanii B-6-1 with fungal pathogens.
| Types of pathogens | Inhibition rate (%) |
|---|---|
| 34.59 ± 0.52 | |
| 35.79 ± 1.13 | |
| 26.57 ± 0.95 |
SD = standard deviation.
Data in the table are expressed as mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Duncan's new multiple range test (P < 0.05).
Inhibitory effects of various treatment solution of antagonistic bacteria E. cowanii on B. cinerea of post-harvest tomatoes.
| Treatment | Disease index | Biocontrol effect (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Fermentation broth (1 × 107 cfu/mL) | 71.14 ± 3.15 b | 23.82 ± 1.81 d |
| Fermentation broth (1 × 108 cfu/mL) | 48.89 ± 1.76 c | 47.64 ± 1.02 c |
| Fermentation broth (1 × 109 cfu/mL) | 4.44 ± 0.68 e | 95.24 ± 2.07 a |
| Bacterial suspension (1 × 107 cfu/mL) | 49.42 ± 3.59 c | 47.08 ± 0.40 d |
| Filtration fluid | 21.11 ± 1.79 d | 77.40 ± 1.03 b |
| Heat kill fluid | 94.23 ± 2.86 a | – |
| Control | 93.38 ± 1.93 a | – |
SD = standard deviation.
Data in the table are expressed as mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Duncan's new multiple range test (P < 0.05).