Literature DB >> 28644204

Hearing Safety From Single- and Double-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children and Young Adults.

Sahana N Kukke1, Carmen C Brewer, Christopher Zalewski, Kelly A King, Diane Damiano, Katharine E Alter, Mark Hallett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Concerns regarding hearing safety have limited the number of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in children and young adults. The objective of this study was to examine the safety of TMS with regards to hearing in a group of 16 children and young adults (17.3 ± 4.9 years) with and without brain injury.
METHODS: Pure-tone hearing thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions were measured before and after exposure to single- and paired-pulse TMS (1-2 sessions of 149-446 TMS pulses at a median of 49%-100% maximum stimulator output over a 2.2 hours period).
RESULTS: No mean change in hearing outcomes was noted. In addition, no clinically significant change in hearing threshold was observed in any participant, and participants did not experience a subjective change in hearing after TMS exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Single- and double-pulse TMS administered within the parameters used in this study, which included hearing protection, can be used in children and young adults without impacting hearing. This study provides further evidence for hearing safety after TMS exposure in children and young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28644204      PMCID: PMC5484061          DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  29 in total

1.  Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development.

Authors:  J A Eyre; J P Taylor; F Villagra; M Smith; S Miller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  No evidence of hearing loss in humans due to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; L G Cohen; L I Shotland; N Dang; A Pikus; E M Wassermann; J P Brasil-Neto; J Valls-Solé; M Hallett
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex and nerve roots in children. Maturation of cortico-motoneuronal projections.

Authors:  K Müller; V Hömberg; H G Lenard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-02

4.  Development and reorganization of descending motor pathways in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  L J Carr
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1996-10

5.  Impulse noise of transcranial magnetic stimulation: measurement, safety, and auditory neuromodulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; Rebecca J Price; Gwendolyn O'Grady; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  A measure of acoustic noise generated from transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.

Authors:  Sameer C Dhamne; Raveena S Kothare; Camilla Yu; Tsung-Hsun Hsieh; Elana M Anastasio; Lindsay Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Cortical activation and inter-hemispheric sensorimotor coherence in individuals with arm dystonia due to childhood stroke.

Authors:  Sahana N Kukke; Ana Carolina de Campos; Diane Damiano; Katharine E Alter; Nicholas Patronas; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the non-lesioned hemisphere improves paretic arm reach-to-grasp performance after chronic stroke.

Authors:  Jarugool Tretriluxana; Shailesh Kantak; Suradej Tretriluxana; Allan D Wu; Beth E Fisher
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2012-12-17

Review 9.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for major depression: a multisite, naturalistic, observational study of quality of life outcome measures in clinical practice.

Authors:  Philip G Janicak; David L Dunner; Scott T Aaronson; Linda L Carpenter; Terrence A Boyadjis; David G Brock; Ian A Cook; Karl Lanocha; Hugh B Solvason; Dafna Bonneh-Barkay; Mark A Demitrack
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.790

View more
  3 in total

1.  Double-Containment Coil With Enhanced Winding Mounting for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Reduced Acoustic Noise.

Authors:  Lari M Koponen; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

3.  Sound comparison of seven TMS coils at matched stimulation strength.

Authors:  Lari M Koponen; Stefan M Goetz; Debara L Tucci; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.