Literature DB >> 28643879

Inter-subject alignment of MEG datasets in a common representational space.

Qiong Zhang1,2, Jelmer P Borst3, Robert E Kass1,2,4, John R Anderson5.   

Abstract

Pooling neural imaging data across subjects requires aligning recordings from different subjects. In magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings, sensors across subjects are poorly correlated both because of differences in the exact location of the sensors, and structural and functional differences in the brains. It is possible to achieve alignment by assuming that the same regions of different brains correspond across subjects. However, this relies on both the assumption that brain anatomy and function are well correlated, and the strong assumptions that go into solving the under-determined inverse problem given the high-dimensional source space. In this article, we investigated an alternative method that bypasses source-localization. Instead, it analyzes the sensor recordings themselves and aligns their temporal signatures across subjects. We used a multivariate approach, multiset canonical correlation analysis (M-CCA), to transform individual subject data to a low-dimensional common representational space. We evaluated the robustness of this approach over a synthetic dataset, by examining the effect of different factors that add to the noise and individual differences in the data. On an MEG dataset, we demonstrated that M-CCA performs better than a method that assumes perfect sensor correspondence and a method that applies source localization. Last, we described how the standard M-CCA algorithm could be further improved with a regularization term that incorporates spatial sensor information. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4287-4301, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  canonical correlation analysis; common representational space; magnetoencephalography; subject alignment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28643879      PMCID: PMC6866831          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  25 in total

1.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

Authors:  J C Mosher; R M Leahy; P S Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Validation of head movement correction and spatiotemporal signal space separation in magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Jukka Nenonen; Jussi Nurminen; Dubravko Kičić; Rozaliya Bikmullina; Pantelis Lioumis; Veikko Jousmäki; Samu Taulu; Lauri Parkkonen; Miikka Putaala; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Stages of processing in associative recognition: evidence from behavior, EEG, and classification.

Authors:  Jelmer P Borst; Darryl W Schneider; Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  James V Haxby; J Swaroop Guntupalli; Andrew C Connolly; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Bryan R Conroy; M Ida Gobbini; Michael Hanke; Peter J Ramadge
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Online and offline tools for head movement compensation in MEG.

Authors:  Arjen Stolk; Ana Todorovic; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Tracking cognitive processing stages with MEG: A spatio-temporal model of associative recognition in the brain.

Authors:  Jelmer P Borst; Avniel S Ghuman; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Source parameter estimation in inhomogeneous volume conductors of arbitrary shape.

Authors:  T F Oostendorp; A van Oosterom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Canonical Correlation Analysis for Data Fusion and Group Inferences: Examining applications of medical imaging data.

Authors:  Nicolle M Correa; Tülay Adali; Yi-Ou Li; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.551

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Common Time Course of Memory Processes Revealed.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Jelmer P Borst; Jon M Fincham; Avniel Singh Ghuman; Caitlin Tenison; Qiong Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-07-10

2.  A technical review of canonical correlation analysis for neuroscience applications.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhuang; Zhengshi Yang; Dietmar Cordes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The integration of social and neural synchrony: a case for ecologically valid research using MEG neuroimaging.

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Kaisu Lankinen; Maria Hakonen; Ruth Feldman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.