Literature DB >> 29991326

The Common Time Course of Memory Processes Revealed.

John R Anderson1, Jelmer P Borst2, Jon M Fincham1, Avniel Singh Ghuman3, Caitlin Tenison1, Qiong Zhang4.   

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to compare memory processes in two experiments, one involving recognition of word pairs and the other involving recall of newly learned arithmetic facts. A combination of hidden semi-Markov models and multivariate pattern analysis was used to locate brief "bumps" in the sensor data that marked the onset of different stages of cognitive processing. These bumps identified a separation between a retrieval stage that identified relevant information in memory and a decision stage that determined what response was implied by that information. The encoding, retrieval, decision, and response stages displayed striking similarities across the two experiments in their duration and brain activation patterns. Retrieval and decision processes involve distinct brain activation patterns. We conclude that memory processes for two different tasks, associative recognition versus arithmetic retrieval, follow a common spatiotemporal neural pattern and that both tasks have distinct retrieval and decision stages.

Keywords:  cognitive neuroscience; memory; neuroimaging; reaction time; task analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29991326      PMCID: PMC6139583          DOI: 10.1177/0956797618774526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  25 in total

1.  Modeling the distinct phases of skill acquisition.

Authors:  Caitlin Tenison; John R Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory.

Authors:  David Badre; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  Inter-subject alignment of MEG datasets in a common representational space.

Authors:  Qiong Zhang; Jelmer P Borst; Robert E Kass; John R Anderson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Using model-based functional MRI to locate working memory updates and declarative memory retrievals in the fronto-parietal network.

Authors:  Jelmer P Borst; John R Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Phases of learning: How skill acquisition impacts cognitive processing.

Authors:  Caitlin Tenison; Jon M Fincham; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Modeling confidence and response time in associative recognition.

Authors:  Chelsea Voskuilen; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Sternberg's method.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Qiong Zhang; Jelmer P Borst; Matthew M Walsh
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related fMRI to reveal cognitive states.

Authors:  Jon M Fincham; Hee Seung Lee; John R Anderson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Thalamic bursts modulate cortical synchrony locally to switch between states of global functional connectivity in a cognitive task.

Authors:  Oscar Portoles; Manuel Blesa; Marieke van Vugt; Ming Cao; Jelmer P Borst
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.