Literature DB >> 28643185

Keeping Disability in Mind: A Case Study in Implantable Brain-Computer Interface Research.

Laura Specker Sullivan1,2,3, Eran Klein4,5,6, Tim Brown4,5, Matthew Sample4,5, Michelle Pham4,5, Paul Tubig4,5, Raney Folland4,5, Anjali Truitt4, Sara Goering4,5.   

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research is an interdisciplinary area of study within Neural Engineering. Recent interest in end-user perspectives has led to an intersection with user-centered design (UCD). The goal of user-centered design is to reduce the translational gap between researchers and potential end users. However, while qualitative studies have been conducted with end users of BCI technology, little is known about individual BCI researchers' experience with and attitudes towards UCD. Given the scientific, financial, and ethical imperatives of UCD, we sought to gain a better understanding of practical and principled considerations for researchers who engage with end users. We conducted a qualitative interview case study with neural engineering researchers at a center dedicated to the creation of BCIs. Our analysis generated five themes common across interviews. The thematic analysis shows that participants identify multiple beneficiaries of their work, including other researchers, clinicians working with devices, device end users, and families and caregivers of device users. Participants value experience with device end users, and personal experience is the most meaningful type of interaction. They welcome (or even encourage) end-user input, but are skeptical of limited focus groups and case studies. They also recognize a tension between creating sophisticated devices and developing technology that will meet user needs. Finally, interviewees espouse functional, assistive goals for their technology, but describe uncertainty in what degree of function is "good enough" for individual end users. Based on these results, we offer preliminary recommendations for conducting future UCD studies in BCI and neural engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain–computer interface; Brain–machine interface; Disability; Research ethics; User-centered design

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28643185     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9928-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  21 in total

Review 1.  Brain-computer interfaces in medicine.

Authors:  Jerry J Shih; Dean J Krusienski; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  User-centred design in brain-computer interface research and development.

Authors:  Andrea Kübler; Gernot Müller-Putz; Donatella Mattia
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-07-29

3.  Brain Painting: usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis.

Authors:  Claudia Zickler; Sebastian Halder; Sonja C Kleih; Cornelia Herbert; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Marcia J Scherer; Caren Sax; Alan Vanbiervliet; Laura A Cushman; John V Scherer
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Developing brain-computer interfaces from a user-centered perspective: Assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals.

Authors:  Giulia Liberati; Alessia Pizzimenti; Luca Simione; Angela Riccio; Francesca Schettini; Maurizio Inghilleri; Donatella Mattia; Febo Cincotti
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Michael L Boninger; Tim M Bruns; Kenneth Curley; Wei Wang; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

7.  Qualitative assessment of patients' attitudes and expectations toward BCIs and implications for future technology development.

Authors:  Silke Schicktanz; Till Amelung; Jochem W Rieger
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-27

8.  The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications.

Authors:  Andrea Kübler; Elisa M Holz; Angela Riccio; Claudia Zickler; Tobias Kaufmann; Sonja C Kleih; Pit Staiger-Sälzer; Lorenzo Desideri; Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf; Donatella Mattia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Enhancing public involvement in assistive technology design research.

Authors:  Tracey Williamson; Laurence Kenney; Anthony T Barker; Glen Cooper; Tim Good; Jamie Healey; Ben Heller; David Howard; Martin Matthews; Sarah Prenton; Julia Ryan; Christine Smith
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2014-04-16

Review 10.  The Human Factors and Ergonomics of P300-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Authors:  J Clark Powers; Kateryna Bieliaieva; Shuohao Wu; Chang S Nam
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2015-08-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Towards Including End-Users in the Design of Prosthetic Hands: Ethical Analysis of a Survey of Australians with Upper-Limb Difference.

Authors:  Mary Jean Walker; Eliza Goddard; Benjamin Stephens-Fripp; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Using brain-computer interfaces: a scoping review of studies employing social research methods.

Authors:  Johannes Kögel; Jennifer R Schmid; Ralf J Jox; Orsolya Friedrich
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Progress in Neuroengineering for brain repair: New challenges and open issues.

Authors:  Gabriella Panuccio; Marianna Semprini; Lorenzo Natale; Stefano Buccelli; Ilaria Colombi; Michela Chiappalone
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.

Authors:  Sara Goering; Eran Klein; Laura Specker Sullivan; Anna Wexler; Blaise Agüera Y Arcas; Guoqiang Bi; Jose M Carmena; Joseph J Fins; Phoebe Friesen; Jack Gallant; Jane E Huggins; Philipp Kellmeyer; Adam Marblestone; Christine Mitchell; Erik Parens; Michelle Pham; Alan Rubel; Norihiro Sadato; Mina Teicher; David Wasserman; Meredith Whittaker; Jonathan Wolpaw; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 1.427

6.  Highly Interactive Brain-Computer Interface Based on Flicker-Free Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Chengcheng Han; Guanghua Xu; Jun Xie; Chaoyang Chen; Sicong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.