Literature DB >> 28643080

Elaboration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Qualitative Investigation of Goals and Strategies.

Krista Redlinger-Grosse1, Patricia McCarthy Veach2, Bonnie S LeRoy2, Heather Zierhut2.   

Abstract

As the genetic counseling field evolves, a comprehensive model of practice is critical. The Reciprocal-Engagement Model (REM) consists of 5 tenets and 17 goals. Lacking in the REM, however, are well-articulated counselor strategies and behaviors. The purpose of the present study was to further elaborate and provide supporting evidence for the REM by identifying and mapping genetic counseling strategies to the REM goals. A secondary, qualitative analysis was conducted on data from two prior studies: 1) focus group results of genetic counseling outcomes (Redlinger-Grosse et al., Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2015); and 2) genetic counselors' examples of successful and unsuccessful genetic counseling sessions (Geiser et al. 2009). Using directed content analysis, 337 unique strategies were extracted from focus group data. A Q-sort of the 337 strategies yielded 15 broader strategy domains that were then mapped to the successful and unsuccessful session examples. Differing prevalence of strategy domains identified in successful sessions versus the prevalence of domains identified as lacking in unsuccessful sessions provide further support for the REM goals. The most prevalent domains for successful sessions were Information Giving and Use Psychosocial Skills and Strategies; and for unsuccessful sessions, Information Giving and Establish Working Alliance. Identified strategies support the REM's reciprocal nature, especially with regard to addressing patients' informational and psychosocial needs. Patients' contributions to success (or lack thereof) of sessions was also noted, supporting a REM tenet that individual characteristics and the counselor-patient relationship are central to processes and outcomes. The elaborated REM could be used as a framework for certain graduate curricular objectives, and REM components could also inform process and outcomes research studies to document and further characterize genetic counselor strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counseling goals; Genetic counseling models; Genetic counseling strategies; Reciprocal-engagement model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28643080     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0114-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  29 in total

1.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Bonnie J Baty; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; Adrian Musters; Debra Roter; William Dudley; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model.

Authors:  Julianne E Hartmann; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Closing Thoughts on Supervision.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A Different Vantage Point: Commentary on "Theories for Psychotherapeutic Genetic Counseling: Fuzzy Trace Theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory".

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jehannine Austin; Alicia Semaka; George Hadjipavlou
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patients' perceptions of what makes genetic counselling effective: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Authors:  Rhona Macleod; David Craufurd; Katie Booth
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2002-03

9.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Distinct communication patterns during genetic counseling for late-onset Alzheimer's risk assessment.

Authors:  Barbara Lerner; J Scott Roberts; Michael Shwartz; Debra L Roter; Robert C Green; Jack A Clark
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-11-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Response to Costa, Lemos, and Paneque Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Julie A McGlynn; Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.159

4.  National Society of Genetic Counselors' Board of Directors response to Myers et al. 'A report of the AGCPD task force to evaluate associations between select admissions requirements, demographics, and performance on ABGC certification examination'.

Authors:  Heather Zierhut; Leila Jamal; Sara Riordan; Patrick Wilson; Meghan Carey; Deepti Babu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.