Literature DB >> 22114234

Patients' perceptions of what makes genetic counselling effective: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Rhona Macleod1, David Craufurd, Katie Booth.   

Abstract

Little is known about what makes for effective genetic counselling. Helping counselees adjust to their genetic situation is highlighted as a goal in most definitions of genetic counselling, but the processes involved in this are less clear. The current investigation focused on counselees' perceptions of their genetic consultation as a possible influence on adjustment. Participants were all attending a Regional Genetics Clinic in the UK for the first time and were being seen for a variety of reasons. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Being seen by an 'expert' was seen as a positive aspect of attending the genetics clinic and one that was associated with receiving full information. The perception that either they, or the doctor, were able actively to do something about their situation, helped to relieve feelings of vulnerability. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the way genetic counselling is conducted.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 22114234     DOI: 10.1177/1359105302007002454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  9 in total

1.  Parents' perspectives on participating in genetic research in autism.

Authors:  Magan Trottier; Wendy Roberts; Irene Drmic; Stephen W Scherer; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-03

2.  From constraints to opportunities? Provision of psychosocial support in portuguese oncogenetic counseling services.

Authors:  Alvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  What counts as effective genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing in late-onset disorders? A study of the consultand's perspective.

Authors:  Lídia Guimarães; Jorge Sequeiros; Heather Skirton; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  How do obstetric providers discuss referrals for prenatal genetic counseling?

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Carrie Mastromarino Haunstetter; Debra Roter; Gail Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Genetic counseling of adults with Williams syndrome: a first study.

Authors:  Katrina Farwig; Amanda G Harmon; Kristina M Fontana; Carolyn B Mervis; Colleen A Morris
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents' preferences regarding counseling at the time of infants' sweat test.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Rebecca L Koscik; Peggy Modaff; Darci Pfeil; Michael J Rock; Philip M Farrell; Caroline Lifchez; Mary Ellen Freeman; William Gershan; Christina Zaleski; Bradley Sullivan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Elaboration of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Qualitative Investigation of Goals and Strategies.

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.537

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.