T J Wilhelm1, A Refeidi, P Palma, T Neufang, S Post. 1. Department of Surgery, Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been proposed as a useful alternative to conventional laparoscopic and open surgery. As compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, it offers the advantages of tactile feedback, better exposure, and a shorter learning curve. There is increasing evidence that HALS retains the advantages of minimal-access surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility as well as the short- and medium-term outcomes of HALS sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. METHODS: The study included 100 consecutive patients between July 1999 and August 2004. Data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up evaluation was performed by standardized telephone interview after a mean postoperative period of 19 months (range, 2-55 months). RESULTS: Two major intraoperative complications occurred: splenic laceration requiring splenectomy and ureteral injury requiring suture. There were only three conversions: one case of pararectal incision and two cases of extended lower Pfannestiel incision. There was no single case of conversion to midline laparotomy. One patient died postoperatively of myocardial infarction. The postoperative complications included intraabdominal hematoma (2%), anastomotic leakage (3%), wound infection (11%) and bladder dysfunction (1%). The reoperation rate was 5%. The median hospital stay was 8 days. In terms of satisfaction with the results, 97% of patients would choose HALS again. CONCLUSIONS: When used for diverticular disease, HALS sigmoid resection has a low intra- and postoperative complication rate. The satisfaction rate among patients is high. Even in technically difficult cases, conversion to midline laparotomy can be avoided.
BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been proposed as a useful alternative to conventional laparoscopic and open surgery. As compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, it offers the advantages of tactile feedback, better exposure, and a shorter learning curve. There is increasing evidence that HALS retains the advantages of minimal-access surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility as well as the short- and medium-term outcomes of HALS sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. METHODS: The study included 100 consecutive patients between July 1999 and August 2004. Data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up evaluation was performed by standardized telephone interview after a mean postoperative period of 19 months (range, 2-55 months). RESULTS: Two major intraoperative complications occurred: splenic laceration requiring splenectomy and ureteral injury requiring suture. There were only three conversions: one case of pararectal incision and two cases of extended lower Pfannestiel incision. There was no single case of conversion to midline laparotomy. One patient died postoperatively of myocardial infarction. The postoperative complications included intraabdominal hematoma (2%), anastomotic leakage (3%), wound infection (11%) and bladder dysfunction (1%). The reoperation rate was 5%. The median hospital stay was 8 days. In terms of satisfaction with the results, 97% of patients would choose HALS again. CONCLUSIONS: When used for diverticular disease, HALS sigmoid resection has a low intra- and postoperative complication rate. The satisfaction rate among patients is high. Even in technically difficult cases, conversion to midline laparotomy can be avoided.
Authors: Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Robert S Sandler; James E Everhart; Mark Donowitz; Elizabeth Adams; Kelly Cronin; Clifford Goodman; Eric Gemmen; Shefali Shah; Aida Avdic; Robert Rubin Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: E M Targarona; E Gracia; J Garriga; C Martínez-Bru; M Cortés; R Boluda; L Lerma; M Trías Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2001-10-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: R W Luijendijk; J Jeekel; R K Storm; P J Schutte; W C Hop; A C Drogendijk; F J Huikeshoven Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kelly A Garrett; Bradley J Champagne; Brian T Valerian; David Peterson; Edward C Lee Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 4.584