Literature DB >> 34820629

Predictors and Consequences of Unplanned Conversion to Open During Robotic Colectomy: An ACS-NSQIP Database Analysis.

Andrew N Mueller1, John D Vossler1, Nicholas H Yim2, Gregory J Harbison2, Kenric M Murayama1.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has become a desired modality for performing colectomy; however, unplanned conversion to an open procedure may be associated with worse outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine predictors and consequences of unplanned conversion to open in a large, high fidelity data set. A retrospective analysis of 11 061 robotic colectomies was conducted using the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2012-2017 database. Predictors of conversion and the effect of conversion on outcomes were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression resulting in risk-adjusted odds ratios of conversion and morbidity/mortality. Overall, 10 372 (93.8%) patients underwent successful robotic colectomy, and 689 (6.2%) had an unplanned conversion. Predictors of conversion included age ≥ 65 years, male gender, obesity, functional status not independent, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification IV-V, non-oncologic indication, emergency case, smoking, recent weight loss, bleeding disorder, and preoperative organ space infection. Conversion is an independent risk factor for mortality, overall morbidity, cardiac morbidity, pulmonary morbidity, renal morbidity, venous thromboembolism morbidity, wound morbidity, sepsis, bleeding, readmission, return to the operating room, and extended length of stay (LOS). Unplanned conversion to open during robotic colectomy is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. ©Copyright 2021 by University Health Partners of Hawai‘i (UHP Hawai‘i).

Entities:  

Keywords:  colectomy; colorectal; conversion; predictors; robotic; unplanned

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34820629      PMCID: PMC8609196     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf        ISSN: 2641-5216


  43 in total

1.  JAMA patient page. Robotic surgery.

Authors:  Deborah Tolmach Sugerman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinoglio; Paolo P Bianchi; Alessandra Marano; Fabio Priora; Luca M Lenti; Ferruccio Ravazzoni; Wanda Petz; Simona Borin; Dario Ribero; Giampaolo Formisano; Emilio Bertani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  L Z Hyde; O Baser; S Mehendale; D Guo; M Shah; R P Kiran
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  A Population-Based Study of 90-Day Hospital Cost and Utilization Associated With Robotic Surgery in Colon and Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Carla F Justiniano; Adan Z Becerra; Zhaomin Xu; Christopher T Aquina; Courtney I Boodry; Maria J Schymura; Francis P Boscoe; Katia Noyes; Larissa K Temple; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Variation in the cost of 5 common operations in the United States.

Authors:  Elliot Wakeam; George Molina; Neel Shah; Stuart R Lipsitz; David C Chang; Atul A Gawande; Alex B Haynes
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yan-Jiun Huang; Yi-No Kang; Yu-Min Huang; Alexander Th Wu; Weu Wang; Po-Li Wei
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.767

Review 7.  Robotic colectomy: is it necessary?

Authors:  E Bertani; A Chiappa; P Ubiali; M L Cossu; P Arnone; B Andreoni
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzon; Fabiano Bini; Genoveffa Balducci; Mario Ferri; Pier Federico Salvi; Franco Marinozzi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Prete; Angela Pezzolla; Fernando Prete; Mario Testini; Rinaldo Marzaioli; Alberto Patriti; Rosa Maria Jimenez-Rodriguez; Angela Gurrado; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Propensity-Matched Analysis of Sigmoidectomies for Diverticular Disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Raskin; Deborah S Keller; Madhu L Gorrepati; Sylvie Akiel-Fu; Shilpa Mehendale; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.