Literature DB >> 28640693

Evaluation of Screening US-detected Breast Masses by Combined Use of Elastography and Color Doppler US with B-Mode US in Women with Dense Breasts: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Su Hyun Lee1, Jin Chung1, Hye Young Choi1, Seon Hyeong Choi1, Eun Bi Ryu1, Kyung Hee Ko1, Hye Ryoung Koo1, Jeong Seon Park1, Ann Yi1, Ji Hyun Youk1, Eun Ju Son1, A Jung Chu1, Jung Min Chang1, Nariya Cho1, Myoung-Jin Jang1, Shin Ho Kook1, Eun Suk Cha1, Woo Kyung Moon1.   

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the value of the combined use of elastography and color Doppler ultrasonography (US) with B-mode US for evaluation of screening US-detected breast masses in women with dense breasts. Materials and Methods This prospective, multicenter study included asymptomatic women with dense breasts who were referred for screening US between November 2013 and December 2014. Eligible women had a newly detected breast mass at conventional B-mode US screening, for which elastography and color Doppler US were performed. The following outcome measures were compared between B-mode US and the combination of B-mode US, elastography, and color Doppler US: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and the number of false-positive findings at screening US. Results Among 1021 breast masses (mean size, 1.0 cm; range, 0.3-3.0 cm) in 1021 women (median age, 45 years), 68 were malignant (56 invasive). Addition of elastography and color Doppler US to B-mode US increased the AUC from 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82, 0.91) to 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95, 0.98; P < .001); specificity from 27.0% (95% CI: 24.2%, 29.9%) to 76.4% (95% CI: 73.6%, 79.1%; P < .001) without loss in sensitivity (95% CI: -1.5%, 1.5%; P > .999); and PPV from 8.9% (95% CI: 7.0%, 11.2%) to 23.2% (95% CI: 18.5%, 28.5%; P < .001), while avoiding 67.7% (471 of 696) of unnecessary biopsies for nonmalignant lesions. Conclusion Addition of elastography and color Doppler US to B-mode US can increase the PPV of screening US in women with dense breasts while reducing the number of false-positive findings without missing cancers. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640693     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning.

Authors:  Xuejun Qian; Jing Pei; Hui Zheng; Xinxin Xie; Lin Yan; Hao Zhang; Chunguang Han; Xiang Gao; Hanqi Zhang; Weiwei Zheng; Qiang Sun; Lu Lu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Ultrasensitive Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging for Characterizing Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Chengwu Huang; U-Wai Lok; Shanshan Tang; Yue Yu; Duane D Meixner; Kathryn J Ruddy; Karthik Ghosh; Robert T Fazzio; Wenwu Ling; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Mathias Lazar; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Diagnostic performance improvement with combined use of proteomics biomarker assay and breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Hong-Kyu Kim; Yumi Kim; Dong-Young Noh; Wonshik Han; Jung Min Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative shear wave elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses, and association with the histological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Voraparee Suvannarerg; Piyanuch Chitchumnong; Wipawan Apiwat; Lassanun Lertdamrongdej; Nattinee Tretipwanit; Pongthep Pisarnturakit; Panitta Sitthinamsuwan; Shanigarn Thiravit; Kobkun Muangsomboon; Pornpim Korpraphong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-03

6.  The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Yu-Jing Yan; Ge-Ge Wu; Xi-Rong Ye; Fan Jiang; Jie Liu; Gang Wang; Yi Wang; Juan Song; Zhi-Ping Pan; Jin-Hua Hu; Chao-Ying Jin; Xiang Wang; Christoph F Dietrich; Xin-Wu Cui
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Myoungae Kwon; Ok Hee Woo; Kyu Ran Cho; Eun Kyung Park; Sang Hoon Cha; Sung Eun Song; Ju Han Lee; JaeHyung Cha; Gil Soo Son; Bo Kyoung Seo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Lu-Ying Gao; Yang Gu; Wen Xu; Jia-Wei Tian; Li-Xue Yin; Hai-Tao Ran; Wei-Dong Ren; Yu-Ming Mu; Jie-Ying Zhang; Cai Chang; Jian-Jun Yuan; Chun-Song Kang; You-Bin Deng; Hui Wang; Xiao-Yan Xie; Bao-Ming Luo; Sheng-Lan Guo; Qi Zhou; En-Sheng Xue; Wei-Wei Zhan; Tong Jiao; Qing Zhou; Jie Li; Ping Zhou; Pin-Tong Huang; Hong-Yuan Xue; Chun-Quan Zhang; Man Chen; Xiang-Xiang Jing; Ying Gu; Jian-Feng Guo; Hong-Yu Ding; Jin-Feng Xu; Wu Chen; Li Liu; Yu-Hong Zhang; Hong-Qiao Wang; Zhong-Ping Mu; Jian-Chu Li; Hong-Yan Wang; Yu-Xin Jiang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  A nomogram constructed using intraoperative ex vivo shear-wave elastography precisely predicts metastasis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Soong June Bae; Ji Hyun Youk; Chang Ik Yoon; Soeun Park; Chi Hwan Cha; Hak Woo Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Seung Ah Lee; Eun Ju Son; Joon Jeong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Yun Woo Chang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.