Literature DB >> 28640019

Mini-fluid Challenge of 100 ml of Crystalloid Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room.

Matthieu Biais1, Hugues de Courson, Romain Lanchon, Bruno Pereira, Guillaume Bardonneau, Marion Griton, Musa Sesay, Karine Nouette-Gaulain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mini-fluid challenge of 100 ml colloids is thought to predict the effects of larger amounts of fluid (500 ml) in intensive care units. This study sought to determine whether a low quantity of crystalloid (50 and 100 ml) could predict the effects of 250 ml crystalloid in mechanically ventilated patients in the operating room.
METHODS: A total of 44 mechanically ventilated patients undergoing neurosurgery were included. Volume expansion (250 ml saline 0.9%) was given to maximize cardiac output during surgery. Stroke volume index (monitored using pulse contour analysis) and pulse pressure variations were recorded before and after 50 ml infusion (given for 1 min), after another 50 ml infusion (given for 1 min), and finally after 150 ml infusion (total = 250 ml). Changes in stroke volume index induced by 50, 100, and 250 ml were recorded. Positive fluid challenges were defined as an increase in stroke volume index of 10% or more from baseline after 250 ml.
RESULTS: A total of 88 fluid challenges were performed (32% of positive fluid challenges). Changes in stroke volume index induced by 100 ml greater than 6% (gray zone between 4 and 7%, including 19% of patients) predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 77 to 99%) and a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 73 to 93%). The area under the receiver operating curve of changes in stroke volume index induced by 100 ml was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.99) and was higher than those of changes in stroke volume index induced by 50 ml (0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.92]; P = 0.01) and pulse pressure variations (0.65 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78]; P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in stroke volume index induced by rapid infusion of 100 ml crystalloid predicted the effects of 250 ml crystalloid in patients ventilated mechanically in the operating room.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640019     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac output optimization with an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy versus non standardized manual fluid administration during elective abdominal surgery: first prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marc Lilot; Amandine Bellon; Marine Gueugnon; Marie-Christine Laplace; Bruno Baffeleuf; Pauline Hacquard; Felicie Barthomeuf; Camille Parent; Thomas Tran; Jean-Luc Soubirou; Philip Robinson; Lionel Bouvet; Olivia Vassal; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Vincent Piriou
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  What is the evidence base for fluid resuscitation in acute medicine? .

Authors:  Adam Seccombe; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

6.  A novel supplemental maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: blood pump-out test performed before renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Daozheng Huang; Huan Ma; Jie Ma; Liyan Hong; Xingji Lian; Yanhua Wu; Yan Wu; Shouhong Wang; Tiehe Qin; Ning Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

7.  Impact of Intravenous Fluid Challenge Infusion Time on Macrocirculation and Endothelial Glycocalyx in Surgical and Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Jiri Pouska; Vaclav Tegl; David Astapenko; Vladimir Cerny; Christian Lehmann; Jan Benes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Evaluation of least significant changes of pulse contour analysis-derived parameters.

Authors:  Hugues de Courson; Loic Ferrer; Grégoire Cane; Eric Verchère; Musa Sesay; Karine Nouette-Gaulain; Matthieu Biais
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Anesthesia-Associated Relative Hypovolemia: Mechanisms, Monitoring, and Treatment Considerations.

Authors:  Jessica Noel-Morgan; William W Muir
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-16

10.  Mini-fluid challenge test predicts stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness during spine surgery in prone position: A STARD-compliant diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Chen-Tse Lee; Tzong-Shiun Lee; Ching-Tang Chiu; Hsiao-Chun Teng; Hsiao-Liang Cheng; Chun-Yu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.