Literature DB >> 28636098

Repeated procedures at the generator pocket are a determinant of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection.

Eduardo Arana-Rueda1, Alonso Pedrote1, Manuel Frutos-López1, Juan Acosta1, Beatriz Jauregui1, Lorena García-Riesco1, Álvaro Arce-León1, Federico Gómez-Pulido1, Juan A Sánchez-Brotons1, Encarnación Gutiérrez-Carretero2, Arístides de Alarcón-González3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of cardiac-device infections have increased in recent years, but the current incidence and risk factors for infection in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are not well known. HYPOTHESIS: The increasing number of ICD infections is related to accumulated pocket manipulations over time.
METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included patients that underwent ICD implantation from 2008 to 2015. The endpoint was time to infection. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors related to infection.
RESULTS: The study included a total of 570 patients, of whom 419 (73.5%) underwent a first implantation. Mean age was 59 ± 14 years, and 80% were male. During a median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range, 18-61 months; 1887 patient-years), infection was identified in 26 patients (4.56%), an incidence of 14.9 × 1000 patient-years. Median time to infection was 9.7 months (interquartile range, 1.35-23.4 months), and 38.5% were late infections (beyond 12 months of follow-up). In patients with replacement implants, the incidence was 3-fold higher than in first implantations (27.7 vs 9.1 × 1000 patient-years; P = 0.002). Cox regression identified 2 independent predictors of ICD infection: cumulative number of interventions at the generator pocket (hazard ratio: 1.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.6, P < 0.001) and pocket hematoma (hazard ratio: 7.0, 95% confidence interval: 2.7-17.9, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of infection in ICD patients is greater than previously reported, largely due to late infections. Each new cumulative intervention at the same generator pocket nearly doubles the risk of infection.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defibrillation-ICD; Incidence; Infection Complication; Noninvasive Risk Assessment Tests

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28636098      PMCID: PMC6490359          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  24 in total

1.  Recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement is associated with an increasing risk of pocket-related complications.

Authors:  C Jan Willem Borleffs; Joep Thijssen; Mihály K de Bie; Johannes B van Rees; Guido H van Welsenes; Lieselot van Erven; Jeroen J Bax; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Martin J Schalij
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Bacterial colonization and infection of electrophysiological cardiac devices detected with sonication and swab culture.

Authors:  Martin Rohacek; Maja Weisser; Richard Kobza; Andreas W Schoenenberger; Gaby E Pfyffer; Reno Frei; Paul Erne; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry.

Authors:  Jeanne E Poole; Marye J Gleva; Theofanie Mela; Mina K Chung; Daniel Z Uslan; Richard Borge; Venkateshwar Gottipaty; Timothy Shinn; Dan Dan; Leon A Feldman; Hanscy Seide; Stuart A Winston; John J Gallagher; Jonathan J Langberg; Kevin Mitchell; Richard Holcomb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Repeated procedures at the generator pocket are a determinant of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection.

Authors:  Eduardo Arana-Rueda; Alonso Pedrote; Manuel Frutos-López; Juan Acosta; Beatriz Jauregui; Lorena García-Riesco; Álvaro Arce-León; Federico Gómez-Pulido; Juan A Sánchez-Brotons; Encarnación Gutiérrez-Carretero; Arístides de Alarcón-González
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Rising rates of cardiac rhythm management device infections in the United States: 1996 through 2003.

Authors:  Andrew Voigt; Alaa Shalaby; Samir Saba
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Pacemaker or defibrillator surgery without interruption of anticoagulation.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Jeff S Healey; George A Wells; Atul Verma; Anthony S Tang; Andrew D Krahn; Christopher S Simpson; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Benoit Coutu; Tiago L L Leiria; Vidal Essebag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Long-term complications related to biventricular defibrillator implantation: rate of surgical revisions and impact on survival: insights from the Italian Clinical Service Database.

Authors:  Maurizio Landolina; Maurizio Gasparini; Maurizio Lunati; Saverio Iacopino; Giuseppe Boriani; Carlo Bonanno; Antonello Vado; Alessandro Proclemer; Alessandro Capucci; Chantal Zucchiatti; Sergio Valsecchi; Renato P Ricci; Massimo Santini
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Mortality and cost associated with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.

Authors:  Muhammad R Sohail; Charles A Henrikson; Mary Jo Braid-Forbes; Kevin F Forbes; Daniel J Lerner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-12

9.  Increased late complex device infections are determined by cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator infection.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Unsworth; Amir Zaidi; Mark R Hargreaves
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Rates of and factors associated with infection in 200 909 Medicare implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implants: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Jordan M Prutkin; Matthew R Reynolds; Haikun Bao; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib; Saurabh Aggarwal; Daniel Z Uslan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  5 in total

1.  Repeated procedures at the generator pocket are a determinant of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection.

Authors:  Eduardo Arana-Rueda; Alonso Pedrote; Manuel Frutos-López; Juan Acosta; Beatriz Jauregui; Lorena García-Riesco; Álvaro Arce-León; Federico Gómez-Pulido; Juan A Sánchez-Brotons; Encarnación Gutiérrez-Carretero; Arístides de Alarcón-González
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Successful defibrillation verification in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients by low-energy shocks.

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Matteo Ziacchi; Andrea Angeletti; Andrea Castelli; Giulia Massaro; Cristian Martignani; Mariolina Lovecchio; Sergio Valsecchi; Igor Diemberger
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Derek Chew; Ranjani Somayaji; John Conly; Derek Exner; Elissa Rennert-May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Should they stay, or should they go: Do we need to remove the old cardiac implantable electronic device if a new system is required on the contralateral side?

Authors:  Willy Weng; Pascal Theriault-Lauzier; David Birnie; Calum Redpath; Mehrdad Golian; Mouhannad M Sadek; Andres Klein; F Daniel Ramirez; Darryl R Davis; Pablo B Nery; Girish M Nair; Simon Hansom; Martin S Green; Alper Aydin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-02-13

5.  Postimplantation pocket hematoma increases risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakrin Kewcharoen; Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan; Sittinun Thangjui; Thiratest Leesutipornchai; Sakditad Saowapa; Apichai Pokawattana; Leenhapong Navaravong
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-03-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.