| Literature DB >> 28630698 |
Francisco Mardones1, Pilar Arnaiz2, Johana Soto-Sánchez3, Juana Saavedra1, Angélica Domínguez1, Jaime Rozowski4, Laura Iriarte5, Jennifer Cantwell Wood6.
Abstract
This paper describes a 4-month pilot study that tested the suitability of a physical activity intervention for first graders (children aged 6 and 7 years) in a public school in Santiago, Chile. Teachers were trained to deliver the programme in the classroom during the school day. Teachers were surveyed to determine if this intervention fit within their curriculum and classroom routines and they reported in a focus group that it was suitable for them. All children actively participated in the programme and positive changes in their attitudes towards physical activity were observed by their teachers. Anthropometrics, blood pressure and hand grip strength were measured in the students. A significant reduction was observed in children with high waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile, and in mean systolic blood pressure. However, statistical power values for those comparisons were rather low. Anthropometry and hand grip strength were not modified. The latter calculations and the lack of a control group are showing the weaknesses of this pilot study and that further research with a larger sample size and an experimental design is strongly needed.Entities:
Keywords: Appetite; Behaviour; Blood pressure; ILSI, International Life Sciences Institute; Obesity; Physical activity; School age population; Waist circumference
Year: 2017 PMID: 28630698 PMCID: PMC5468735 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2017.14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Questions and responses from the final focus group meeting with the teachers at Luis Matte Larraín public school (10 December 2014)
| Why were you unable to implement the three daily sessions as proposed for the programme? | We only implemented two daily sessions. It was considered to be too difficult to fit in the three sessions as our schedule is already overcommitted with the amount of material that we must cover in only 5 h whereas most schools operate on a 7 h day |
| What were the easiest parts of the programme to implement? (Referring to the sequential stages for each activity including an initial relaxation, exercise, songs, stories, and final relaxation) | The sequence of each activity seemed to be adequate to the level and routine of the class. It allowed for the children to relax, be more focused, and ready to respond to questions like it were natural |
| Was there a part of the programme that was more difficult to implement (calming the children initially and getting their attention, the initial routine, the exercises, the songs, the stories, making do with the limited space, or the final relaxation)? | It was unanimously agreed among the teachers that the lack of space was the most difficult aspect of implementing the programme. The lack of space reduced the level of exercise intensity and some exercises had to be adapted to ensure proper ventilation and to avoid accidents |
| Do you believe that this is an effective way to teach positive physical activity habits to your children? Did you observe that the children changed their habits? If not, do you think you would see changes in their physical activity habits after a year of implementing this programme? | The programme was sufficient. The children were more active after participating, and we found them to be calmer in the classroom. A longer period of implementing the programme would have more impact |
| What benefits for you, the teachers, did you see with the implementation of TAKE10!? For those of you who were sedentary, did you find it a challenge to have to jump, run and move? | The teachers had to be models for the children's active participation. J. S. served as a model for the teachers to take on the routines |
Anthropometric characteristics of eighty-nine first-grade students in the Municipality of Puente Alto in Santiago, Chile, 2014
(Mean values and standard deviations; numbers and percentages)
| Pre-TAKE10!® | Post-TAKE10!® | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | Power | ||||
| Weight (kg) | 25·1 | 4·5 | 25·7 | 4·6 | 0·678 | <40 |
| Height (cm) | 124·3 | 4·6 | 125·6 | 4·7 | <0·001 | 99·9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16·9 | 7·0 | 16·2 | 2·2 | 0·365 | <40 |
| BMI | 0·1 | 1·3 | 0·1 | 1·2 | 0·450 | <40 |
| Nutritional status | 0·413 | <20 | ||||
| Underweight | ||||||
| | 7 | 5 | ||||
| % | 7·0 | 5·6 | ||||
| Normal weight | ||||||
| | 58 | 62 | ||||
| % | 65·2 | 69·7 | ||||
| Overweight | ||||||
| | 15 | 14 | ||||
| % | 16·9 | 15·7 | ||||
| Obese | ||||||
| | 9 | 8 | ||||
| % | 10·1 | 9·0 | ||||
| Waist circumference (cm) | 59·2 | 6·3 | 59·2 | 5·8 | 0·152 | <40 |
| High waist circumference | 0·016 | <20 | ||||
| 22 | 15 | |||||
| % | 24·7 | 16·9 | ||||
| Triceps skin folds (mm) | 10·8 | 4·4 | 11 | 4·6 | 0·666 | <40 |
| Subscapular skin folds (mm) | 9·1 | 8·0 | 8·6 | 5·3 | 0·510 | <40 |
| Body fat percentage | 18·2 | 8·0 | 17·9 | 7·3 | 0·438 | <40 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 96·7 | 8·2 | 94·2 | 8·5 | 0·025 | <40 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 48·4 | 8·1 | 47·9 | 6·1 | 0·816 | <40 |
| High blood pressure | 0·625 | <20 | ||||
| 3 | 1 | |||||
| % | 3·3 | 1·1 | ||||
| Dynamometry (kg) | 10·2 | 5·0 | 10·3 | 2·1 | 0·835 | <40 |