Literature DB >> 23044984

Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54).

Brad Metcalf1, William Henley, Terence Wilkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, and to what extent, physical activity interventions affect the overall activity levels of children.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus) and reference lists of included studies and of relevant review articles. STUDY SELECTION: Design: randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials (cluster and individual) published in peer reviewed journals. INTERVENTION: incorporated a component designed to increase the physical activity of children/adolescents and was at least four weeks in duration. OUTCOMES: measured whole day physical activity objectively with accelerometers either before or immediately after the end of the intervention period. DATA ANALYSIS: INTERVENTION effects (standardised mean differences) were calculated for total physical activity, time spent in moderate or vigorous physical activity, or both for each study and pooled using a weighted random effects model. Meta-regression explored the heterogeneity of intervention effects in relation to study participants, design, intervention type, and methodological quality.
RESULTS: Thirty studies (involving 14,326 participants; 6153 with accelerometer measured physical activity) met the inclusion criteria and all were eligible for meta-analysis/meta-regression. The pooled intervention effect across all studies was small to negligible for total physical activity (standardised mean difference 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.20; P<0.01) and small for moderate or vigorous activity (0.16, 0.08 to 0.24; P<0.001). Meta-regression indicated that the pooled intervention effect did not differ significantly between any of the subgroups (for example, for total physical activity, standardised mean differences were 0.07 for age <10 years and 0.16 for ≥ 10 years, P=0.19; 0.07 for body mass index across the entire range and 0.22 for exclusively overweight/obese children, P=0.07; 0.12 for study duration ≤ 6 months and 0.09 for >6 months, P=0.71; 0.15 for home/family based intervention and 0.10 for school based intervention, P=0.53; and 0.09 for higher quality studies and 0.14 for lower quality studies, P=0.52).
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides strong evidence that physical activity interventions have had only a small effect (approximately 4 minutes more walking or running per day) on children's overall activity levels. This finding may explain, in part, why such interventions have had limited success in reducing the body mass index or body fat of children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044984     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e5888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  210 in total

Review 1.  Do school-based interventions focusing on physical activity, fitness, or fundamental movement skill competency produce a sustained impact in these outcomes in children and adolescents? A systematic review of follow-up studies.

Authors:  Samuel K Lai; Sarah A Costigan; Philip J Morgan; David R Lubans; David F Stodden; Jo Salmon; Lisa M Barnett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Classes of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in 5th Grade Children.

Authors:  Sharon E Taverno Ross; Marsha Dowda; Rodney K Dishman; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2016-05

3.  Network interventions on physical activity in an afterschool program: an agent-based social network study.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; David A Shoham; Eric Tesdahl; Sabina B Gesell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Evaluation of a comprehensive school physical activity program: Be a Champion!

Authors:  Camelia R Singletary; Glenn Weaver; Russell L Carson; Michael W Beets; Russell R Pate; Ruth P Saunders; Alexandra G Peluso; Justin B Moore
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2019-05-02

5.  Physical activity for children in elementary schools: time for a rethink?

Authors:  Mark R Beauchamp; Ryan E Rhodes; Claudio R Nigg
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The effect of increasing risk and challenge in the school playground on physical activity and weight in children: a cluster randomised controlled trial (PLAY).

Authors:  V L Farmer; S M Williams; J I Mann; G Schofield; J C McPhee; R W Taylor
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 7.  Multi-etiological Perspective on Child Obesity Prevention.

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Kathleen J Motil; Jennette P Moreno
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2019-01-16

Review 8.  Effect of childhood obesity prevention programs on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Cai; Yang Wu; Renee F Wilson; Jodi B Segal; Miyong T Kim; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Construct validity of selected measures of physical activity beliefs and motives in fifth and sixth grade boys and girls.

Authors:  Rod K Dishman; Ruth P Saunders; Kerry L McIver; Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2013-03-04

10.  Parents accurately perceive problematic eating behaviors but overestimate physical activity levels in preschool children.

Authors:  Katherine Q Scott-Andrews; Carissa Wengrovius; Leah E Robinson
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.