Literature DB >> 28630254

Reward Selectively Modulates the Lingering Neural Representation of Recently Attended Objects in Natural Scenes.

Clayton Hickey1,2, Marius V Peelen3.   

Abstract

Theories of reinforcement learning and approach behavior suggest that reward can increase the perceptual salience of environmental stimuli, ensuring that potential predictors of outcome are noticed in the future. However, outcome commonly follows visual processing of the environment, occurring even when potential reward cues have long disappeared. How can reward feedback retroactively cause now-absent stimuli to become attention-drawing in the future? One possibility is that reward and attention interact to prime lingering visual representations of attended stimuli that sustain through the interval separating stimulus and outcome. Here, we test this idea using multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data collected from male and female humans. While in the scanner, participants searched for examples of target categories in briefly presented pictures of cityscapes and landscapes. Correct task performance was followed by reward feedback that could randomly have either high or low magnitude. Analysis showed that high-magnitude reward feedback boosted the lingering representation of target categories while reducing the representation of nontarget categories. The magnitude of this effect in each participant predicted the behavioral impact of reward on search performance in subsequent trials. Other analyses show that sensitivity to reward-as expressed in a personality questionnaire and in reactivity to reward feedback in the dopaminergic midbrain-predicted reward-elicited variance in lingering target and nontarget representations. Credit for rewarding outcome thus appears to be assigned to the target representation, causing the visual system to become sensitized for similar objects in the future.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How do reward-predictive visual stimuli become salient and attention-drawing? In the real world, reward cues precede outcome and reward is commonly received long after potential predictors have disappeared. How can the representation of environmental stimuli be affected by outcome that occurs later in time? Here, we show that reward acts on lingering representations of environmental stimuli that sustain through the interval between stimulus and outcome. Using naturalistic scene stimuli and multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data, we show that reward boosts the representation of attended objects and reduces the representation of unattended objects. This interaction of attention and reward processing acts to prime vision for stimuli that may serve to predict outcome.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377297-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; attention; fMRI; motivation; reward; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28630254      PMCID: PMC6596703          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0684-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  10 in total

1.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  Separable Influences of Reward on Visual Processing and Choice.

Authors:  Alireza Soltani; Mohsen Rakhshan; Robert J Schafer; Brittany E Burrows; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Neural correlates of attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with social reward.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.065

4.  Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Andy Jeesu Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

5.  Cross-modal generalization of value-based attentional priority.

Authors:  Laurent Grégoire; Lana Mrkonja; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.

Authors:  Lev Tankelevitch; Eelke Spaak; Matthew F S Rushworth; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Value-driven attentional capture enhances distractor representations in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Vy A Vo; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Semantic generalization of value-based attentional priority.

Authors:  Laurent Grégoire; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Reward and loss incentives improve spatial working memory by shaping trial-by-trial posterior frontoparietal signals.

Authors:  Youngsun T Cho; Flora Moujaes; Charles H Schleifer; Martina Starc; Jie Lisa Ji; Nicole Santamauro; Brendan Adkinson; Antonija Kolobaric; Morgan Flynn; John H Krystal; John D Murray; Grega Repovs; Alan Anticevic
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 7.400

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.