Literature DB >> 28629874

Neural activity during attentional conflict predicts reduction in tinnitus perception following rTMS.

G A James1, J D Thostenson2, G Brown2, G Carter2, H Hayes2, S P Tripathi2, D J Dobry2, R B Govindan2, J L Dornhoffer2, D K Williams2, C D Kilts2, M S Mennemeier2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjective idiopathic tinnitus is an intrusive, distracting, and potentially disabling disorder characterized by phantom perception of sounds. Although tinnitus has no approved pharmacologic treatment, recent evidence supports the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to alleviate tinnitus symptoms. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Repetitive TMS delivered over the middle superior temporal gyrus (STG) may alter ratings of tinnitus awareness and annoyance more than loudness due to change in attentional processing. STG has reciprocal connections to regions of the prefrontal cortex that mediate attention. To probe the hypothesized influence of STG stimulation on attention, a subset of patients with tinnitus enrolled in an rTMS clinical trial [n = 12, 9 male, mean (sd) age = 49 (15) years] underwent an attentional conflict task before and after rTMS treatment in a repeated-measures functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.
METHODS: The Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT), a Stroop-based visual attentional conflict fMRI task, was used to map participants' neural processing of attentional conflict prior to rTMS intervention (Baseline) and after three rTMS intervention arms: Sham, 1 Hz, and 10 Hz (four sessions per arm, 1800 pulses per session, delivered @110% of the motor threshold over the posterior superior temporal gyrus).
RESULTS: All measures of tinnitus severity (awareness, loudness, and annoyance) improved with 1 Hz rTMS intervention; however, the greatest and most robust changes were observed for ratings of tinnitus awareness (mean 16% reduction in severity from Baseline, p < 0.01). The MSIT elicited a similar pattern of neural activation among tinnitus participants at Baseline compared to an independent sample of 43 healthy comparison adults (r = 0.801, p = 0.001). Linear regression with bootstrap resampling showed that greater recruitment of bilateral prefrontal and bilateral parietal regions by MSIT at Baseline corresponded with poorer treatment response. Individual regions' activities explained 37-67% variance in participant treatment response, with left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex's MSIT activity at Baseline explaining the greatest reduction in tinnitus awareness following 1 Hz stimulation. Although left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity at Baseline also predicted reduction in tinnitus loudness and annoyance (∼50% variance explained), these symptoms were more strongly predicted by right middle occipital cortex (∼70% variance explained) - suggesting that the neural predictors of symptom-specific treatment outcomes may be dissociable.
CONCLUSION: These candidate neural reactivity markers of treatment response have potential clinical value in identifying tinnitus sufferers who would or would not therapeutically benefit from rTMS intervention.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional conflict; Biomarkers; Individual differences; Multi-source interference task; Patient selection; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28629874      PMCID: PMC5600281          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  47 in total

1.  The Case for a Definitive Multisite, Randomized Clinical Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Tinnitus.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Mark George
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Following Either Prefrontal Cortical-only or Dual-site Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Tinnitus Patients: A Double-blind Randomized Study.

Authors:  Tae-Soo Noh; Jeong Sug Kyong; Mun Young Chang; Moo-Kyun Park; Jun-Ho Lee; Seung-Ha Oh; June Sic Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Myung-Whan Suh
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The Multi-Source Interference Task: an fMRI task that reliably activates the cingulo-frontal-parietal cognitive/attention network.

Authors:  George Bush; Lisa M Shin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Jonathan D Power; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Controversy: Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/ transcranial direct current stimulation show efficacy in treating tinnitus patients?

Authors:  Berthold Langguth; Dirk de Ridder; John L Dornhoffer; Peter Eichhammer; Robert L Folmer; Elmar Frank; Felipe Fregni; Christian Gerloff; Eman Khedr; Tobias Kleinjung; Michael Landgrebe; Scott Lee; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Alain Londero; Renata Marcondes; Aage R Moller; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Christian Plewnia; Simone Rossi; Tanit Sanchez; Philipp Sand; Winfried Schlee; Dipl Pysch; Thomas Steffens; Paul van de Heyning; Goeran Hajak
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Pretreatment brain states identify likely nonresponse to standard treatments for depression.

Authors:  Callie L McGrath; Mary E Kelley; Boadie W Dunlop; Paul E Holtzheimer; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Efficacy of different protocols of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: Pooled analysis of two randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  B Langguth; M Landgrebe; E Frank; M Schecklmann; P G Sand; V Vielsmeier; G Hajak; T Kleinjung
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Resting-state networks predict individual differences in common and specific aspects of executive function.

Authors:  Andrew E Reineberg; Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Brendan E Depue; Naomi P Friedman; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.

Authors:  C W Newman; G P Jacobson; J B Spitzer
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-02

10.  An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Martin A Lindquist; Mathieu Roy; Choong-Wan Woo; Ethan Kross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association of Central Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Interventions With Efficacy and Safety in Tinnitus Management: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiann-Jy Chen; Bing-Syuan Zeng; Ching-Nung Wu; Brendon Stubbs; Andre F Carvalho; Andre R Brunoni; Kuan-Pin Su; Yu-Kang Tu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Tien-Yu Chen; Pao-Yen Lin; Chih-Sung Liang; Chih-Wei Hsu; Shih-Pin Hsu; Hung-Chang Kuo; Yen-Wen Chen; Ping-Tao Tseng; Cheng-Ta Li
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Haidi Yang; Gui Cheng; Lingfei Huang; Tao Zhang; Haiying Jia
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 3.  The Neural Mechanisms of Tinnitus: A Perspective From Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jinghua Hu; Jinluan Cui; Jin-Jing Xu; Xindao Yin; Yuanqing Wu; Jianwei Qi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.

Authors:  Tonisha Kearney-Ramos; Margaret Haney
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.201

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.