Literature DB >> 20633385

Controversy: Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/ transcranial direct current stimulation show efficacy in treating tinnitus patients?

Berthold Langguth1, Dirk de Ridder, John L Dornhoffer, Peter Eichhammer, Robert L Folmer, Elmar Frank, Felipe Fregni, Christian Gerloff, Eman Khedr, Tobias Kleinjung, Michael Landgrebe, Scott Lee, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Alain Londero, Renata Marcondes, Aage R Moller, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Christian Plewnia, Simone Rossi, Tanit Sanchez, Philipp Sand, Winfried Schlee, Dipl Pysch, Thomas Steffens, Paul van de Heyning, Goeran Hajak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus affects 10% of the population, its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, and treatment is elusive. Functional imaging has demonstrated a relationship between the intensity of tinnitus and the degree of reorganization in the auditory cortex. Experimental studies have further shown that tinnitus is associated with synchronized hyperactivity in the auditory cortex. Therefore, targeted modulation of auditory cortex has been proposed as a new therapeutic approach for chronic tinnitus.
METHODS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are noninvasive methods that can modulate cortical activity. These techniques have been applied in different ways in patients with chronic tinnitus. Single sessions of high-frequency rTMS over the temporal cortex have been successful in reducing the intensity of tinnitus during the time of stimulation and could be predictive for treatment outcome of chronic epidural stimulation using implanted electrodes.
RESULTS: Another approach that uses rTMS as a treatment for tinnitus is application of low-frequency rTMS in repeated sessions, to induce a lasting change of neuronal activity in the auditory cortex beyond the duration of stimulation. Beneficial effects of this treatment have been consistently demonstrated in several small controlled studies. However, results are characterized by high interindividual variability and only a moderate decrease of the tinnitus. The role of patient-related (for example, hearing loss, tinnitus duration, age) and stimulation-related (for example, stimulation site, stimulation protocols) factors still remains to be elucidated.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in this early stage of investigation, there is a convincing body of evidence that rTMS represents a promising tool for pathophysiological assessment and therapeutic management of tinnitus. Further development of this technique will depend on a more detailed understanding of the neurobiological effects mediating the benefit of TMS on tinnitus perception. Moreover clinical studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20633385     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  25 in total

1.  Hand-assisted positioning and contact pressure control for motion compensated robotized transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Lars Richter; Ralf Bruder; Achim Schweikard
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Variable changes in PET activity before and after rTMS treatment for tinnitus.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Kenneth C Chelette; Shawn Allen; Twyla B Bartel; William Triggs; Timothy Kimbrell; Joseph Crew; Tiffany Munn; Ginger J Brown; John Dornhoffer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology: A review of established and prospective applications.

Authors:  Mark C Eldaief; Daniel Z Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-12

4.  Auditory cortex electrical stimulation suppresses tinnitus in rats.

Authors:  Jinsheng Zhang; Yupeng Zhang; Xueguo Zhang
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-06

5.  Neural activity during attentional conflict predicts reduction in tinnitus perception following rTMS.

Authors:  G A James; J D Thostenson; G Brown; G Carter; H Hayes; S P Tripathi; D J Dobry; R B Govindan; J L Dornhoffer; D K Williams; C D Kilts; M S Mennemeier
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Treatment of chronic tinnitus with repeated sessions of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: outcomes from an open-label pilot study.

Authors:  Elmar Frank; Martin Schecklmann; Michael Landgrebe; Julia Burger; Peter Kreuzer; Timm B Poeppl; Tobias Kleinjung; Göran Hajak; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Therapeutic impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robabeh Soleimani; Mir Mohammad Jalali; Tolou Hasandokht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Short term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with catastrophic intractable tinnitus: preliminary report.

Authors:  Ho Yun Lee; Seung Don Yoo; Eun Woong Ryu; Jae Yong Byun; Seung Geun Yeo; Moon Suh Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 9.  Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Mark S George; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Effects of individual alpha rTMS applied to the auditory cortex and its implications for the treatment of chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Nathan Weisz; Claudia Lüchinger; Gregor Thut; Nadia Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.